Meta-Analysis: Pharmacologic Treatment of Obesity
- Zhaoping Li, MD, PhD;
- Margaret Maglione, MPP;
- Wenli Tu, MS;
- Walter Mojica, MD;
- David Arterburn, MD, MPH;
- Lisa R. Shugarman, PhD;
- Lara Hilton, BA;
- Marika Suttorp, MS;
- Vanessa Solomon, MA;
- Paul G. Shekelle, MD, PhD; and
- Sally C. Morton, PhD
-
From the Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center, which includes RAND Health Division, Santa Monica, and the Greater
Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; and Department of Veterans Affairs, Cincinnati, Ohio.
-
Figure 1. HTA = Health Technology Assessment; NHS = National Health Service. *See the companion article by Maggard et al.
in this issue. †These 39 articles were randomized, controlled trials and reviews of sibutramine, phentermine, and diethylpropion. Literature flow.
-
Figure 2. Data are from reference . = 0.14 (chi-square test); I = 43%. Pooled analysis of weighted mean difference in weight loss with sibutramine versus placebo at 44 to 54 weeks.35P2
-
Figure 3. = 0.00 (chi-square test); I = 83%. Pooled analysis of mean difference in weight loss with orlistat versus placebo at 12 months.P2
-
Figure 4. For bupropion, = 0.00 (chi-square test) and I = 84%. For fluoxetine, = 0.00 (chi-square test) and I = 85%. Pooled analysis of weight loss with bupropion and fluoxetine versus placebo at 6 to 12 months.P2P2
-
Figure 5. = 0.00 (chi-square test) and I = 87%. Pooled analysis of weight loss with topiramate versus placebo at 6 months.P2
Responses to this article
-
Ann Intern Med
April 5, 2005
vol. 142
no. 7
532-546