Gene–Diet Interactions in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders

  1. Mark P. Mattson, PhD
  1. From the National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Abstract

    While there are many examples of people who live for 100 years or more with little evidence of a decline in brain function, many others are not so fortunate and experience a neurodegenerative disorder, such as Alzheimer disease or Parkinson disease. Although an increasing number of genetic factors that may affect the risk for neurodegenerative disorders are being identified, emerging findings suggest that dietary factors play major roles in determining whether the brain ages successfully or experiences a neurodegenerative disorder. Dietary factors may interact with disease-causing or predisposing genes in molecular cascades that either promote or prevent the degeneration of neurons. Epidemiologic findings suggest that high-calorie diets and folic acid deficiency increase the risk for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease; studies of animal models of these disorders have shown that dietary restriction (reduced calorie intake or intermittent fasting) and dietary supplementation with folic acid can reduce neuronal damage and improve behavioral outcome. Animal studies have shown that the beneficial effects of dietary restriction on the brain result in part from increased production of neurotrophic factors and cytoprotective protein chaperones in neurons. By keeping homocysteine levels low, folic acid can protect cerebral vessels and prevent the accumulation of DNA damage in neurons caused by oxidative stress and facilitated by homocysteine. Although additional studies are required in humans, the emerging data suggest that high-calorie diets and elevated homocysteine levels may render the brain vulnerable to age-related neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in persons with a genetic predisposition to such disorders.

    Christopher M. Callahan, MD; Colleen A. McHorney, PhD; and Cynthia D. Mulrow, MD, MSc, Editors

    Neurodegenerative disorders are increasingly common as life expectancy increases. Effective means of preventing and treating cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and many types of cancer have been developed during the past 50 years, resulting in a striking increase in the number of persons older than 70 years of age. In addition to advances in the management of chronic disease, the demographic shift that resulted from altered birth rates in the 1940s and 1950s (leading to the “Baby Boomer” generation) has contributed to the increased number of older adults. The result is a progressive increase in the number of people with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease, two incurable brain disorders that take a heavy toll on patients and their relatives, as well as the health care system (1).

    Alzheimer disease involves the progressive degeneration and death of neurons in brain regions, such as the hippocampus and basal forebrain, that are involved in learning, memory, and emotional behaviors. Parkinson disease involves the progressive degeneration of neurons in the substantia nigra, resulting in the patient's inability to control body movements. Although the cause of most cases of Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease is not known, some cases result from a specific genetic abnormality. For example, mutations in three different genes (amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2) cause early-onset, dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (2); mutations in α-synuclein cause some cases of Parkinson disease (3).

    Although Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease are usually considered as distinct disorders in which different populations of neurons in the brain degenerate, they share several features of the neurodegenerative process. Both disorders involve increased oxidative stress, metabolic impairment, and abnormal protein aggregation (4). An early event in Alzheimer disease, which is believed to trigger synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death, is increased production and aggregation of β-amyloid peptide. This process occurs mainly in regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus and associated cortical structures, that are involved in learning and memory processes. During the process of aggregation, the amyloid peptide generates reactive oxygen species, resulting in membrane lipid peroxidation and impairment of membrane ion-motive adenosine triphosphatases and glucose transporters (4). By this mechanism, amyloid disrupts cellular ion homeostasis and renders neurons vulnerable to excitotoxicity and apoptosis.

    Mitochondrial dysfunction involving impairment of complex I and increased oxyradical production play major roles in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson disease. Therefore, antioxidants and agents that preserve mitochondrial function can improve outcome, as has been demonstrated in animal models of Parkinson disease. The factors that initiate the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson disease is unclear. Evidence suggests roles for environmental toxins, such as pesticides and trace metals, in combination with the increased oxidative stress associated with the aging process. A role for environmental neurotoxins in Parkinson disease is strengthened by the fact that several toxins, including MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrapyridine) and rotenone, can induce Parkinson-like clinical symptoms and neuropathologic changes in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans (5).

    Calories Count—against You and Your Brain

    Overeating is a major modifiable risk factor for several age-related diseases, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent findings suggest that calorie intake also influences the risk for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease. A prospective study of a large cohort of people in New York City revealed that those with low-calorie or low-fat diets had significantly lower risks for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease than did those with higher calorie intake (6, 7). Of interest, the risks for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease were more strongly correlated with calorie intake than with weight or body mass index. One interpretation of the latter finding is that persons who have a metabolic constitution that allows them to maintain a normal body weight, even with a high caloric intake, may be at increased risk for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease.

    A longitudinal, prospective, population-based study evaluated 2459 community-dwelling Yoruba residents of Nigeria and 2147 community-dwelling, genetically related African-American residents of Indianapolis (8). The age-adjusted incidence of dementia was significantly higher in the Indiana cohort, which suggests the involvement of environmental factors in disease risk; different calorie intake in the two study samples (low in Nigeria and high in Indiana) is one possible factor. Although not established in the latter study, one clear difference between the two study samples was calorie intake (low in Nigeria and high in Indiana).

    Strong evidence that calorie intake may affect the risk for neurodegenerative disorders comes from animal studies. Rats maintained on dietary restriction for 2 to 4 months exhibit increased resistance of hippocampal neurons to degeneration caused by the amnestic toxin kainic acid; this resistance led to a profound deficit in learning and memory in rats fed ad libitum but little or no memory deficit in rats maintained on dietary restriction (9). In another study, the vulnerability of hippocampal and cortical neurons to excitotoxicity and apoptosis was decreased in presenilin 1 mutant mice maintained on dietary restriction (10). In a model of Parkinson disease, the vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons to MPTP toxicity was decreased and motor function was improved by dietary restriction (11). Of interest, dietary restriction not only is neuroprotective; it also stimulates neural stem cells in the brain to produce new nerve cells (12) and might thereby promote the reconstruction of neuronal circuits damaged by injury or disease.

    Recent studies of rodents have revealed cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of dietary restriction on the brain (Figure). Dietary restriction increases the production of neurotrophic factors, particularly brain-derived neurotrophic factor in many different regions of the brain (12, 13). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor can enhance learning and memory, can protect neurons against oxidative and metabolic insults, and can stimulate neurogenesis; these actions may protect neurons against age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Dietary restriction also induces the production of protein chaperones, such as heat-shock protein 70 and glucose-regulated protein 78, which are known to help cells resist various insults (11, 14). Therefore, it appears that dietary restriction promotes neuronal survival, plasticity, and even neurogenesis by inducing a mild cellular stress response that involves activation of genes that encode proteins designed to promote neuronal growth and survival (Figure).

    Figure. Dietary restriction induces a mild cellular stress response in neurons as a result of its effects on energy availability and activity in neuronal circuits. Neurons respond to this stress by increasing the production of proteins that enhance cellular stress resistance; examples include neurotrophic factors, protein chaperones (such as heat-shock proteins), and antiapoptotic proteins (such as Bcl-2). A similar mechanism may stimulate neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Peripheral effects of dietary restriction may also benefit the brain. For example, enhanced insulin sensitivity and decreased homocysteine and cholesterol levels would be expected to prevent age-related damage to cerebral blood vessels and may also have more direct beneficial effects on neurons and glia.
    View larger version:
    Figure. Dietary restriction induces a mild cellular stress response in neurons as a result of its effects on energy availability and activity in neuronal circuits. Neurons respond to this stress by increasing the production of proteins that enhance cellular stress resistance; examples include neurotrophic factors, protein chaperones (such as heat-shock proteins), and antiapoptotic proteins (such as Bcl-2). A similar mechanism may stimulate neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Peripheral effects of dietary restriction may also benefit the brain. For example, enhanced insulin sensitivity and decreased homocysteine and cholesterol levels would be expected to prevent age-related damage to cerebral blood vessels and may also have more direct beneficial effects on neurons and glia. Working model for the mechanism by which dietary restriction can increase brain health.

    Dietary Folate, Homocysteine, and Neurodegenerative Disorders

    Levels of homocysteine in the blood increase with age, and persons with elevated homocysteine levels are at increased risk for vascular disease, heart attack, and stroke (15). Many patients with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease have elevated homocysteine levels; a recent prospective study of the Framingham Heart Study cohort revealed that persons with elevated homocysteine levels are at increased risk for Alzheimer disease (16). Cells produce homocysteine from the amino acid methionine; homocysteine is metabolized by remethylation to methionine by enzymes that require folic acid and cobalamin (vitamin B12) or is converted to cysteine by cystathionine β-synthase, a pyridoxine (vitamin B6)-dependent enzyme. Patients with a genetic deficiency of cystathionine β-synthase exhibit a clinical phenotype that includes mental retardation, cerebral atrophy, and seizures.

    Folic acid deficiency can result in hyperhomocysteinemia, and data suggest that many patients with Alzheimer disease have very low plasma levels of folic acid (17).

    Studies of animal models of Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease have shown that, by decreasing homocysteine levels, dietary folic acid can be neuroprotective. In an amyloid precursor protein mutant mouse model of Alzheimer disease, homocysteine levels increased and hippocampal neurons degenerated when the mice were maintained on a folate-deficient diet (18). In a model of Parkinson disease, damage to dopaminergic neurons was increased and motor dysfunction was enhanced in mice maintained on a folate-deficient diet (19). These findings suggest that homocysteine may increase the risk for Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease by rendering neurons vulnerable to age-related increases in oxidative stress. Folic acid deficiency and homocysteine may endanger neurons by promoting the accumulation of DNA damage by impairing DNA repair. The increased DNA damage may then trigger a form of programmed cell death called apoptosis(20).

    Dietary Interventions To Promote Successful Brain Aging

    Neurodegenerative disorders are proving very difficult to treat, and this fact emphasizes the importance of identifying ways to prevent these diseases. The emerging epidemiologic and experimental data described earlier, together with the fact that dietary restriction consistently increases life span in all mammals studied to date, provide a strong rationale for future studies in humans to determine whether dietary restriction will reduce the risk for age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Dietary restriction may not only benefit obese persons (body mass index > 25 kg/m2); it may also reduce the risk for disease in persons whose body weights are within the “normal” range (body mass index between 20 and 25 kg/m2). The current average daily calorie intake of Americans is approximately 2700 for women and more than 3000 for men. When a person reaches a low body mass index (≤ 20 kg/m2), a daily calorie intake in the range of 1600 to 2200 calories would be expected to promote optimal health. However, randomized, controlled trials with well-defined end points are required to establish an optimum range of calorie intake before recommendations can be confidently made.

    Because homocysteine level has been established as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke (15), it is important that homocysteine levels be measured and that (if levels are elevated) diet be appropriately modified to reduce homocysteine levels. Plasma homocysteine concentrations typically range between 5 and 15 µmol/L. The risk for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and Alzheimer disease increases considerably when homocysteine levels are greater than 10 µmol/L; it is reasonable to expect the same is true for Parkinson disease. Dietary supplementation with 400 µg of folic acid can decrease homocysteine levels by 2 to 5 µmol/L in most persons; thus, a folic acid concentration of 15 µmol/L could mean a two- to fourfold decrease in risk for Alzheimer disease. More information on homocysteine and folate can be found at the Web site of the American Heart Association (http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/99/1/178).

    An increasing number of genetic factors that either cause or increase the risk for neurodegenerative disorders are being identified. Genetic mutations can cause rare forms of Alzheimer disease (amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2), Parkinson disease (α-synuclein and parkin), Huntington disease (huntingtin), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase). Data from transgenic mice expressing a disease-causing mutation suggest that the course of some of these inherited disorders can be modified by dietary factors (10) (Duan W, Mattson MP. Unpublished data). On the other hand, dietary restriction had no beneficial effect on disease onset and actually accelerated disease progression in Cu/Zn-SOD mutant mice (21). Dietary modifications may be particularly useful in persons who may have a genetic predisposition for a neurodegenerative disorder. Examples include persons with an δ4 allele of apolipoprotein E who are at increased risk for Alzheimer disease (2) and those with the C677T polymorphism in methyl tetrahydrofolate reductase who have elevated homocysteine levels (22).

    Although we have focused on dietary restriction and folate, many different dietary factors probably influence the health of the brain. For example, animal studies have suggested that creatine, antioxidants (such as vitamin E and flavonoids), and anti-inflammatory agents have neuroprotective actions. On the other hand, emerging evidence suggests that consumption of diets high in saturated fats and cholesterol can increase the risk for Alzheimer disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (23). Collectively, the available data suggest that a brain-healthy diet is very similar to a heart-healthy diet. Specific dietary components may affect brain functions. For example, data suggest that tryptophan (a precursor of the neurotransmitter serotonin) can affect mood, whereas dietary choline (a precursor of acetylcholine) can affect learning and memory (24).

    While the emerging data suggest that dietary factors can affect the risk for age-related neurodegenerative disorders (Tables 1 and 2), it is unclear whether they will have any major effect on the course of these disorders in symptomatic patients. No current evidence shows that dietary restriction or folic acid supplementation will benefit symptomatic patients, and we have not found any clear benefit of short-term dietary restriction (days to weeks) in animal models of neurodegenerative disorders (9). However, as methods for early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease improve, it will be of considerable interest to perform clinical trials of caloric restriction in patients who are in early preclinical stage of the disease. Clinical trials of folic acid in patients with Alzheimer disease are in progress and should provide an answer as to whether this approach will be beneficial.

    Table 1. Evidence That Calorie Intake Affects the Risk for Alzheimer Disease and Parkinson Disease
    Table 2. Evidence That Elevated Homocysteine Levels and Low Folate Levels May Increase the Risk for Alzheimer Disease and Parkinson Disease

    Christopher M. Callahan, MD; Colleen A. McHorney, PhD; and Cynthia D. Mulrow, MD, MSc, Editors

    Article and Author Information

    • Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

    • Requests for Single Reprints: Mark P. Mattson, PhD, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, Gerontology Research Center 4F01, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224; e-mail, mattsonm{at}grc.nia.nih.gov.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    14. 14.
    15. 15.
    16. 16.
    17. 17.
    18. 18.
    19. 19.
    20. 20.
    21. 21.
    22. 22.
    23. 23.
    24. 24.
    25. 25.
    26. 26.
    27. 27.
    28. 28.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents