The Cost of Institutional Review Board Procedures in Multicenter Observational Research
- Keith Humphreys, PhD;
- Jodie Trafton, PhD; and
- Todd H. Wagner, PhD
- Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Stanford University Medical Center (Humphreys, Trafton, Wagner)
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
TO THE EDITOR:
Background: In recent years, there has been significant controversy over how institutional review board (IRB) procedures are structured, administered, and balanced against other concerns (for example, the feasibility of multicenter research) (1). Formal economic analysis has been largely absent in these debates. With …
RSS Feeds









