Theophylline for the Treatment of Atrioventricular Block after Myocardial Infarction

  1. Barry D. Bertolet, MD;
  2. Elzbieta B. McMurtrie, MD;
  3. James A. Hill, MD; and
  4. Luiz Belardinelli, MD
  1. From the University of Florida Health Sciences Center and Gainesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida. Requests for Reprints: Barry D. Bertolet, MD, Box 100-277, JHMHC, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610. Current Author Addresses: Drs. Bertolet, McMurtrie, Hill, and Belardinelli: Box 100-277, JHMHC, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

    Abstract

    Objective: To show that second- or third-degree atrioventricular block occurring as an early complication of acute inferior myocardial infarction is mediated by adenosine.

    Setting: Cardiac care unit.

    Design: Uncontrolled, observational, hypothesis-driven study.

    Patients: Patients who developed clinically significant atrioventricular nodal blockade within 4 hours of admission for acute inferior myocardial infarction.

    Intervention: Theophylline, 100 mg/min intravenously to a maximum of 250 mg.

    Measurements: Continuous multilead electrocardiographic monitoring before and after administration of theophylline.

    Results: During a 6-month period, eight men who had had acute inferior myocardial infarction developed clinically significant atrioventricular block. Three had third-degree block, and five had high-grade second-degree block. In all patients, 1:1 atrioventricular nodal conduction was restored and normal sinus rhythm reappeared within 3 minutes of the administration of theophylline. All patients remained free of arrhythmia for at least 24 hours.

    Conclusions: Adenosine produced by the ischemic myocardium may induce atrioventricular nodal block. In our patients, atrioventricular nodal block was resistant to conventional therapy such as atropine, but it responded to the adenosine antagonist theophylline.

    Adenosine is known to cause bradyarrhythmias, such as atrioventricular conduction delay [1]. Substantial evidence from laboratory animals [2] affirms that endogenous adenosine may play a mechanistic role in bradyarrhythmias associated with myocardial ischemia, hypoxia, or both. Similarly, case reports [3-9] suggest that endogenous adenosine may cause clinically significant arrhythmias in patients during acute myocardial infarction, the sick sinus syndrome, cardiac arrest, or cardiac transplant rejection. Adenosine mediates its cardiac actions through at least two cell-surface receptor subtypes, A1 and A12 [10]. The A1 receptor mediates both the negative chronotropic effects of adenosine on the sinoatrial node and the negative dromotropic effects of adenosine on the atrioventricular node. Activation of the A1 receptor also inhibits the positive inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic effects of catecholamines [10]. The A2 receptors that are present in endothelial and vascular smooth-muscle cells mediate vasodilatation [10]. In the presence of excess adenosine, these cardiac actions may become undesirable, causing bradyarrhythmias and hypotension and resulting in low cardiac output [11].

    Methylxanthine derivatives, such as theophylline, antagonize the cardiac actions of adenosine in a competitive manner [12]. We previously showed that in the presence of clinically significant concentrations of adenosine in humans, theophylline reverses A1-mediated atrioventricular block more readily than it reverses A2-mediated coronary vasodilation [13]. In this report, we provide evidence to show that second- or third-degree atrioventricular block occurring as an early complication of acute inferior myocardial infarction is probably mediated by endogenous adenosine. This is shown by the fact that this atrioventricular block can be promptly converted to a normal sinus rhythm by using theophylline.

    Methods

    Patients admitted to the Gainesville Veterans Affairs Hospital with a diagnosis of acute inferior myocardial infarction were monitored for clinically significant and persistent atrioventricular conduction delay. When such a dysrhythmia was seen, the primary care physician was instructed to treat the patient with intravenous atropine according to the 1992 Emergency Cardiac Care/American Heart Association guidelines [14]. If this therapy failed to restore 1:1 atrioventricular nodal conduction and normal sinus rhythm, or if it was not used, 150 to 250 mg of theophylline were given as a slow intravenous injection at a rate of 100 mg/min. The patient's heart rhythm was monitored for recurrent arrhythmias using 2-lead cardiac telemetry for at least 24 hours. No patient had a previous history of cardiac arrhythmias, and the electrocardiogram done for each patient at study entry showed a normal sinus rhythm. Patients were treated with oral aspirin (325 mg/d), intravenous heparin, and nitroglycerin. No patient had received β-blockers or calcium antagonists before the onset of the bradyarrhythmia.

    Results

    During a 6-month period, 11 men who were hospitalized with acute inferior myocardial infarction developed persistent and clinically significant atrioventricular conduction delay within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms. Eight patients either failed to respond to the initial standard treatment with atropine or were directly treated, at the discretion of the primary physician, with theophylline. No bradyarrhythmia converted to a sinus rhythm before the administration of theophylline. Six of the 8 patients had received thrombolytic therapy before the onset of the atrioventricular conduction delay. Three patients developed hemodynamically significant third-degree atrioventricular block, and 5 developed high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block (Table 1).

    Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Infarction-Related Atrioventricular Nodal Blockade

    All patients developed clinically significant atrioventricular nodal conduction delays 30 to 240 minutes (mean ±SD, 69 ± 72 minutes) after the onset of myocardial infarction symptoms. All had symptoms or signs of hypoperfusion (six had dizziness; one had fatigue; five had cool, clammy skin; three had changes in mental status; and the mean systolic blood pressure was 74 ± 13 mm Hg). Two of the three patients who developed third-degree atrioventricular block and four of the five patients who developed second-degree atrioventricular block were initially treated unsuccessfully with atropine (1 mg given intravenously). Patients received theophylline (mean dose, 218 ± 37 mg) as a slow intravenous injection. Figure 1 shows electrocardiographic recordings from a patient with third-degree atrioventricular block who converted to normal sinus rhythm after receiving 150 mg of theophylline and who remained in normal sinus rhythm with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction for 36 hours of observation. In all patients, 1:1 atrioventricular nodal conduction and normal sinus rhythm were restored within 1.8 ± 0.7 minutes after the injection of theophylline. In association with the resumption of sinus rhythm and 1:1 atrioventricular conduction, the mean systolic blood pressure increased from 74 ± 13 mm Hg to 112 ± 6 mm Hg (n = 8), and all signs and symptoms of hypoperfusion subsided after administration of theophylline. No patient had worsening of anginal pain, and three patients reported a noticeable decrease in anginal pain.

    Figure 1. New-onset third-degree heart block (p waves are marked by arrows) that began 45 minutes after the patient was hospitalized for an acute inferior myocardial infarction. The patient had accompanying dizziness and on physical examination had cool, clammy skin and a systolic blood pressure of 68 mm Hg. After the administration of theophylline, 150 mg, an immediate conversion to normal sinus rhythm with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction occurred. The patient's systolic blood pressure increased to 110 mm Hg, and all symptoms abated. The normal sinus rhythm persisted for more than 36 hours of observation.
    View larger version:
    Figure 1. New-onset third-degree heart block (p waves are marked by arrows) that began 45 minutes after the patient was hospitalized for an acute inferior myocardial infarction. The patient had accompanying dizziness and on physical examination had cool, clammy skin and a systolic blood pressure of 68 mm Hg. After the administration of theophylline, 150 mg, an immediate conversion to normal sinus rhythm with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction occurred. The patient's systolic blood pressure increased to 110 mm Hg, and all symptoms abated. The normal sinus rhythm persisted for more than 36 hours of observation. Electrocardiographic recordings from leads II and aVF. Top.Bottom.

    Discussion

    Our findings in this uncontrolled and observational but hypothesis-driven study show that theophylline, an adenosine-receptor antagonist, can convert ischemia-related atrioventricular nodal conduction disturbances to normal sinus rhythm. Because each of the eight patients converted to 1:1 atrioventricular nodal conduction with normal sinus rhythm within 3 minutes (1.8 ± 0.7 minutes) of the administration of theophylline, it is unlikely that the dysrhythmias resolved spontaneously. The relevance of these findings is greatly enhanced by the fact that theophylline antagonizes the negative chronotropic and dromotropic effect of adenosine in humans [13]. Additionally, in the doses administered, the primary action of theophylline is adenosine antagonism and not sympathomimetic stimulation [15]. Atropine would not be expected to potentiate the effects of theophylline. These results indicate that, under conditions in which excessive depression of cardiac function (such as bradyarrhythmia) is secondary to an increased production of adenosine by the heart, A1 adenosine-receptor antagonists may prove to be useful.

    Patients with acute inferior myocardial infarctions are more likely than patients with anterior-wall myocardial infarctions to develop atrioventricular block because the blood supply to the atrioventricular node is usually supplied by the right coronary artery [16]. Patients with “early” atrioventricular block (occurring less than 24 hours into their hospital course) are less likely to respond to atropine, more likely to require temporary pacing, and more likely to have a morbid or mortal event than are similar patients who develop “late” atrioventricular block (occurring more than 24 hours into their hospital course) [17]. Because of the poor prognosis associated with “early” atrioventricular block and the ineffectiveness of the current therapy for it, the efficacy of alternative therapies, such as A1 1 adenosine-receptor antagonists, should be investigated. Our results are the first to suggest that theophylline can be used as primary or rescue therapy for “early” bradyarrhythmias associated with myocardial infarction.

    One of the limitations of our study is that the administration of theophylline was neither blinded nor directly compared with other standard therapy. Another is that the number of patients studied was relatively small. Nevertheless, our results provide strong circumstantial evidence to show that theophylline is useful in bradyarrhythmias related to myocardial infarction, and they provide the rationale for future evaluation of the role that endogenous adenosine plays in ischemia-related rhythm disturbances.

    In conclusion, adenosine produced by the ischemic myocardium may induce significant atrioventricular blockade. These arrhythmias—which may be resistant to conventional therapy, such as atropine—appear to respond to the adenosine antagonist theophylline. In light of present and previous observations, theophylline can be considered as an alternative when standard front-line antiarrhythmic therapy has failed. By promptly converting dysrhythmia to normal sinus rhythm, theophylline may make invasive and risky procedures, such as temporary pacemaker placement, unnecessary. A1 adenosine-receptor antagonists more potent, specific, and selective than theophylline may prove to be valuable in the short- and long-term management of cardiac arrhythmias associated with excess endogenous adenosine production.

    @copy; 1995 American College of Physicians

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    14. 14.
    15. 15.
    16. 16.
    17. 17.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents