Mechanical Ventilation with or without 7-Day Circuit Changes

A Randomized Controlled Trial

  1. Marin H. Kollef;
  2. Steven D. Shapiro;
  3. Victoria J. Fraser;
  4. Patricia Silver;
  5. Denise M. Murphy;
  6. Ellen Trovillion;
  7. Mona L. Hearns;
  8. Rodger D. Richards;
  9. Lisa Cracchilo; and
  10. Linda Hossin
  1. From Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Hospital, and Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri. Requests for Reprints: Marin H. Kollef, MD, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8052, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Daniel P. Schuster, MD, for his review of the manuscript and Darnetta M. Baker, RRT, for her personal communication.

    Abstract

    Objective: To determine whether a practice of not routinely changing ventilator circuits in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia.

    Design: Randomized controlled trial.

    Setting: Intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals.

    Patients: 300 patients admitted to an intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation for more than 5 days.

    Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either no routine ventilator circuit changes or circuit changes every 7 days.

    Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Other outcome measures included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and hospital mortality.

    Results: 147 patients were randomly assigned to receive no routine ventilator circuit changes, and 153 patients were randomly assigned to receive circuit changes every 7 days. The two groups were similar at the time of randomization with regard to demographic characteristics, intensive care unit admission diagnoses, and severity of illness. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was seen in 36 patients (24.5%) receiving no routine changes and in 44 patients (28.8%) receiving changes every 7 days (relative risk, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.17]). No statistically significant differences for hospital mortality, intensive care unit mortality, death during mechanical ventilation, death in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, or mortality directly attributed to ventilator-associated pneumonia were found between the two treatment groups (P ≥ 0.11). Patients receiving changes every 7 days had 247 circuit changes costing a total of $7410; patients receiving no routine changes had a total of 11 circuit changes costing $330.

    Conclusion: The elimination of routine ventilator circuit changes can reduce medical care costs without increasing the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents