A New Range for the Anion Gap
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
TO THE EDITOR:
The anion gap, the difference between routinely measured anions and cations of the serum, or NA+ − (Cl− + HCO3−), is a useful tool for deciphering simple and mixed acid-base disorders. When low, the anion gap can be used to indicate the presence of occult cancer or drug poisoning. The traditional normal value for the anion gap has been 12 ± 4 mEq/L (normal range, 8 to 16 mEq/L), values that textbooks continue to reiterate [1, 2]. However, as noted by Winter and colleagues [3] and others [4], the range for the anion gap is much narrower than previously thought because of the use of the ion-selective electrode. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the serum anion gap in 222 patients with normal serum albumin and creatinine levels. We attempted to eliminate the effects of renal failure and hypoalbuminemia, two factors known to modify anion gap values. The results (mean ±SD) of our analysis were as follows: serum sodium level, 140 ± 2.7 mEq/L; potassium level, 4.6 ± 0.4 mEq/L; chloride level, 105 ± 4 mEq/L; CO2 level, 28 ± 2.9 mEq/L; and anion gap, 6.6 ± 2 mEq/L (range, 2.6 to 10.6 mEq/L). This range is almost identical to the value reported by Winter and colleagues [3].
The exact reason for the lower anion gap value is not entirely clear. One possible explanation may be that, with ion-selective electrode technology, serum chloride levels tend to be higher, whereas the serum sodium levels closely resemble serum water levels. These methods are widely used by clinical laboratories, some of which correct this chloride overestimation and use the typical anion gap range as a reference value. Knowledge of the lower range of the anion gap is not only of theoretical interest; it also has practical bedside applications. In a recent study of lactic acidosis in critically ill patients [5], all patients with blood lactate levels higher than 10 mmol/L had anion gap values exceeding 16 mEq/L; 50% of patients with lactate levels between 5 and 9.9 mmol/L and 79% of those with lactate levels between 2.5 and 5 mmol/L had anion gap values less than 16 mEq/L. I believe that this finding results from the fact that the current anion gap value is excessive; if a lower range is adopted, nearly all cases of metabolic acidosis could be easily identified. Also of note, the use of ion-selective electrodes has made pseudohyponatremia obsolete, although use of the term continues.
S. A. Sadjadi, MD
Veterans Administration Medical Center; Hampton, VA 23667
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
•Type with double-spacing
•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
- Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians
RSS Feeds









