Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Smits, M.
space
  arrow  Hunink, M.G. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS

Predicting Intracranial Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography in Patients with Minor Head Injury: The CHIP Prediction Rule

20 March 2007 | Volume 146 Issue 6 | Page I-55

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.

The summary below is from the full report titled "Predicting Intracranial Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography in Patients with Minor Head Injury: The CHIP Prediction Rule." It is in the 20 March 2007 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 146, pages 397-405). The authors are M. Smits, D.W.J. Dippel, E.W. Steyerberg, G.G. de Haan, H.M. Dekker, P.E. Vos, D.R. Kool, P.J. Nederkoorn, P.A.M. Hofman, A. Twijnstra, H.L.J. Tanghe, and M.G.M. Hunink.


What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
space

Even a relatively minor blow to the head can lead to serious trouble if it causes bleeding in or around the brain. The brain is a soft organ. It is covered with blood vessels that can be damaged when the brain moves rapidly within the skull as a result of a severe blow to the head, such as when a person's head strikes the pavement after falling off a moving bicycle. During the fall, the body, including the brain, moves rapidly through the air. When the head strikes the pavement, the skull stops suddenly, but the brain keeps moving rapidly until it strikes the inside of the skull. The resulting forces can rupture blood vessels or fracture the skull. When blood collects in the small space between the brain and the skull, it presses against the brain and pushes it against the skull. The resulting pressure can severely damage the brain unless a neurosurgeon removes the blood. Fortunately, blood is easy to detect with a computed tomography (CT) scan. When emergency department doctors see patients with head injuries, even a minor bump on the head, they usually order a CT scan of the head to be sure that blood is not present. Methods that use a patient's history and examination can identify patients who have enough damage to cause bleeding. Clinical prediction rules can identify patients who have a head injury that is bad enough to cause them to lose consciousness. Many patients do not lose consciousness after a head injury, and these rules might not be safe to use in them.


Why did the researchers do this particular study?
space

To develop a rule to help patients with serious brain damage or bleeding after head injury, regardless of whether they lost consciousness.


Who was studied?
space

Adults who came to the emergency department within 24 hours after a blunt injury to the head and with few or no signs of brain damage.


How was the study done?
space

A neurologist took the patient's history and examined the patient before a CT scan was performed. The authors examined hospital records to determine whether the patient required neurosurgery and obtained information about the outcome of their injury.


What did the researchers find?
space

Of 3181 patients, 243 (7.6%) had CT scans that showed evidence of brain trauma, bleeding, or skull fracture. Seventeen patients required a neurosurgical operation. The authors found 10 major predictors of brain damage on CT scan or need for neurosurgery and 8 minor predictors. All patients who required neurosurgery had at least 1 major predictor or at least 2 minor predictors. Ninety-six percent of patients who had evidence of brain damage, bleeding, or skull fracture on CT scan had at least 1 major predictor or at least 2 minor predictors.


What were the limitations of the study?
space

The authors did not test the rule to see how well it worked in a new group of patients with blunt head injury.


What are the implications of the study?
space

If a patient with head injury has at least 1 major or at least 2 minor predictors of serious injury, he or she should receive a CT scan. Patients without these findings have little chance of a serious brain injury or bleeding, and they may not need a CT scan. Not doing a CT scan in these patients would reduce the cost of caring for patients with head injury.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
Predicting Intracranial Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography in Patients with Minor Head Injury: The CHIP Prediction Rule
Annals 2007 146: I-55. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Smits, M G M Hunink, P J Nederkoorn, H M Dekker, P E Vos, D R Kool, P A M Hofman, A Twijnstra, G G de Haan, H L J Tanghe, et al.
A history of loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia in minor head injury: "conditio sine qua non" or one of the risk factors?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 78(12): 1359 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
CARPHOLOGY by Rajendra
Practical Neurology, June 1, 2007; 7(3): 206 - 206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Another CT Prediction Rule for Head Injury
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 27, 2007; 2007(427): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Predicting Serious Consequences of Minor Head Injury
Journal Watch (General), April 10, 2007; 2007(410): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Smits, M.
space
  arrow  Hunink, M.G. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Physicians.