 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Evaluating the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Carrying Staphylococcus aureus in the Nonhospitalized U.S. Population
7 March 2006 | Volume 144 Issue 5 | Page I-22
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "A U.S. Population-Based Survey of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization." It is in the 7 March 2006 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 144, pages 318-325). The authors are P.L. Graham III, S.X. Lin, and E.L. Larson.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a type of bacteria commonly carried on the skin and in the noses of healthy people without causing infection. This is known as bacterial colonization. However, when S. aureus organisms invade the body, they can cause serious infections. Some S. aureus organisms can be treated easily with antibiotics (methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA]) while others are resistant to antibiotics, such as methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Doctors don't know how commonly people in the United States are colonized with S. aureus and whether certain factors increase the risk for being colonized with MRSA.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To know the extent and pattern of colonization with S. aureus in the United States, what the risk factors were for being colonized with MRSA or with MSSA, and what antibiotics could be used to treat infections with these bacteria.
Who was studied?
9622 people from the general population of the United States who participated in a national health study (the 2001–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES]) and who had bacterial cultures performed from a nasal swab specimen. The participants were representative of the U.S. population.
How was the study done?
The researchers analyzed the results of the most recent NHANES study, evaluating bacterial culture results, antibiotic resistance patterns of the bacteria, and personal characteristics of the participants (age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, and birthplace), as well as participants' insurance coverage, health status, and history of treatment with antibiotics and hospitalizations.
What did the researchers find?
The researchers estimated that 84 million people in the United States were colonized with MSSA and 2 million were colonized with MRSA. The highest rate of colonization with MRSA occurred among people who had lived in a long-term care facility within the past 12 months, those with diabetes, women, and people who were 65 years of age or older. Half of those colonized with MRSA had a genetic type of S. aureus that has previously been associated with hospital-acquired infections, and half had a type that has previously been associated with community-acquired infections. Black people and those of Mexican birth were less likely than others to be colonized with S. aureus. Those with the community type of MRSA were more likely to respond to antibiotics, such as erythromycin, clindamycin, and ciprofloxacin, all of which can be given by mouth.
What were the limitations of the study?
The data from the NHANES study are now several years old and may not provide an up-to-date picture of current patterns of colonization.
What are the implications of the study?
Doctors can use the information from this study to evaluate the risk for colonization with MRSA and provide more appropriate antibiotic care when infection occurs.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Kumar, L. Wang, J. Fan, A. Kraft, M. E. Bose, S. Tiwari, M. Van Dyke, R. Haigis, T. Luo, M. Ghosh, et al. Detection of 11 Common Viral and Bacterial Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Pneumonia or Sepsis in Asymptomatic Patients by Using a Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay with Manual (Enzyme Hybridization) or Automated (Electronic Microarray) Detection J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2008; 46(9): 3063 - 3072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Farley, P. D. Stamper, T. Ross, M. Cai, S. Speser, and K. C. Carroll Comparison of the BD GeneOhm Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR Assay to Culture by Use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for Detection of MRSA in Nasal Surveillance Cultures from an At-Risk Community Population J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2008; 46(2): 743 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. McBrien, G. R. Felizardo, D. G. Orr, and M. J. Raymond Using Focus Groups to Revise an Educational Booklet for People Living With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 19 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Hota, C. Ellenbogen, M. K. Hayden, A. Aroutcheva, T. W. Rice, and R. A. Weinstein Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections at a Public Hospital: Do Public Housing and Incarceration Amplify Transmission? Arch Intern Med, May 28, 2007; 167(10): 1026 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Hawkes, M. Barton, J. Conly, L. Nicolle, C. Barry, and E. L. Ford-Jones Community-associated MRSA: Superbug at our doorstep Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 2, 2007; 176(1): 54 - 56. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Phillips, C. MacDougall, and D. A Holdford Analysis of Empiric Antimicrobial Strategies for Cellulitis in the Era of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2007; 41(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. McDonald, A. Dougall, D. Holt, F. Huygens, F. Oppedisano, P. M. Giffard, J. Inman-Bamber, A. J. Stephens, R. Towers, J. R. Carapetis, et al. Use of a Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping System To Demonstrate the Unique Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Remote Aboriginal Communities. J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2006; 44(10): 3720 - 3727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Gilbert, J. MacDonald, D. Gregson, J. Siushansian, K. Zhang, S. Elsayed, K. Laupland, T. Louie, K. Hope, M. Mulvey, et al. Outbreak in Alberta of community-acquired (USA300) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people with a history of drug use, homelessness or incarceration Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 18, 2006; 175(2): 149 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Staph Infections: Think Beyond "Keflex" Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 25, 2006; 2006(425): 10 - 10. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Community-Acquired MRSA Skin Infections: Not Uncommon Journal Watch Dermatology, April 11, 2006; 2006(411): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 MRSA in the Community Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, April 7, 2006; 2006(407): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Community-Acquired MRSA Skin Infections: Not Uncommon Journal Watch (General), March 31, 2006; 2006(331): 7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Moellering Jr. The growing menace of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med, March 7, 2006; 144(5): 368 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
