 |
 |
|
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
The goal of screening is to detect cancer before it has spread or when it is still a polyp. Some cancers and polyps bleed, although usually the blood is invisible to the naked eye. The simplest, least costly way to screen for colorectal cancer is to test for blood in the stool. If blood is present, the physician should examine the entire colon (colonoscopy) for polyps or cancer.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
What Is the Best Way To Test for Colorectal Cancer?
18 January 2005 | Volume 142 Issue 2 | Page I-23
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Accuracy of Screening for Fecal Occult Blood on a Single Stool Sample Obtained by Digital Rectal Examination: A Comparison with Recommended Sampling Practice." It is in the 18 January 2005 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 142, pages 81-85). The authors are J.F. Collins, D.A. Lieberman, T.E. Durbin, D.G. Weiss, and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #380 Group.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Cancer of the large intestine (colorectal cancer) is one of the most common causes of cancer death. Early treatment, before cancer has spread to other organs, often cures colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer begins as a colon polyp, a small mushroom-like growth on the inside surface of the colon. The cells in a colon polyp can't spread to other organs, but some types of colon polyps contain cells that will develop the ability to spread as the polyp grows.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To see how often patients with cancer or polyps have blood in the stool. The authors compared 2 methods of getting stool for testing. One method uses a single sample obtained when the doctor does a rectal examination; the other method uses 6 samples obtained by the patient at home.
Who was studied?
2665 patients at 13 Veterans Affairs medical centers. None had symptoms of colorectal cancer.
How was the study done?
All patients had a test for stool blood after a rectal examination. All patients obtained 6 samples of stool at home and returned them to the doctor for testing, and all patients had a complete examination of the colon (colonoscopy).
What did the researchers find?
Two hundred eighty-four patients had cancer or large polyps that were likely to become cancer. Only 4.9% of these patients had positive results on a test for blood in the single sample of stool obtained during the rectal examination. Many more of the 284 patients (23.9%) had positive results on the 6 samples obtained at home. Therefore, the 6-sample method is a much better way to obtain stool for testing than the method of using a single sample obtained during a rectal examination.
What were the limitations of the study?
Colonoscopy may have failed to detect colorectal cancer or large polyps in a few patients.
What are the implications of the study?
Testing for blood in a sample of stool obtained after a rectal examination in the doctor's office is a very poor way to detect colorectal cancer or large polyps. Physicians should not use it as a screening test. Instead, they should use the recommended method for obtaining stool for testing, which is to ask the patient to obtain 6 samples at home.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. A. Ahlquist, D. J. Sargent, C. L. Loprinzi, T. R. Levin, D. K. Rex, D. J. Ahnen, K. Knigge, M. P. Lance, L. J. Burgart, S. R. Hamilton, et al. Stool DNA and Occult Blood Testing for Screen Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2008; 149(7): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland, R. A. Smith, D. Brooks, K. S. Andrews, C. Dash, F. M. Giardiello, S. Glick, T. R. Levin, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 130 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley Cancer Screening in the United States, 2008: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Cancer Screening Issues CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G Fraser Faecal occult blood tests - eliminate, enhance or update? Ann Clin Biochem, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 117 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Allison, L. C. Sakoda, T. R. Levin, J. P. Tucker, I. S. Tekawa, T. Cuff, M. P. Pauly, L. Shlager, A. M. Palitz, W. K. Zhao, et al. Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms With New Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Update on Performance Characteristics J Natl Cancer Inst, October 3, 2007; 99(19): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2007; 57(2): 90 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Levi, P. Rozen, R. Hazazi, A. Vilkin, A. Waked, E. Maoz, S. Birkenfeld, M. Leshno, and Y. Niv A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2007; 146(4): 244 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. E. Basch, R. L. Wolf, C. H. Brouse, C. Shmukler, A. Neugut, L. T. DeCarlo, and S. Shea Telephone Outreach to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2246 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. B. El-Serag, L. Petersen, H. Hampel, P. Richardson, and G. Cooper The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the department of veterans affairs. Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2006; 166(20): 2202 - 2208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Roessler, W. Rollinger, L. Mantovani-Endl, M.-L. Hagmann, S. Palme, P. Berndt, A. M. Engel, M. Pfeffer, J. Karl, H. Bodenmuller, et al. Identification of PSME3 as a Novel Serum Tumor Marker for Colorectal Cancer by Combining Two-dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis with a Strictly Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Data Analysis Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2092 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J. Greenberger and P. Sharma Update in Gastroenterology and Hepatology Ann Intern Med, August 15, 2006; 145(4): 294 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R. Martinez, S. E. Young, R. E. Hoedema, L. J. Foshag, and A. J. Bilchik Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance: Current Standards and Future Trends Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 768 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. C. Taylor A 71-Year-Old Woman Contemplating a Screening Colonoscopy JAMA, March 8, 2006; 295(10): 1161 - 1167. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2006 CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2006; 56(1): 11 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Roessler, W. Rollinger, S. Palme, M.-L. Hagmann, P. Berndt, A. M. Engel, B. Schneidinger, M. Pfeffer, H. Andres, J. Karl, et al. Identification of Nicotinamide N-Methyltransferase as a Novel Serum Tumor Marker for Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6550 - 6557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Brenner and G. Rennert Fecal DNA Biomarkers for the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia: Attractive, but Is It Feasible? J Natl Cancer Inst, August 3, 2005; 97(15): 1107 - 1109. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Kane Accuracy of a Single Fecal Occult Blood Test in Screening for Colorectal Cancer Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 235 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Wolff Office-Based Testing for Fecal Occult Blood Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 235 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Jackson and R. Craig Office-Based Testing for Fecal Occult Blood Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 235 - 236. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. H. Pham, D. Schrag, J. L. Hargraves, and P. B. Bach Delivery of Preventive Services to Older Adults by Primary Care Physicians JAMA, July 27, 2005; 294(4): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 DRE-Based FOBT: Common but Not Useful Journal Watch Women's Health, February 22, 2005; 2005(222): 8 - 8. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Digital FOBT Often Used but Very Insensitive Journal Watch Gastroenterology, February 16, 2005; 2005(216): 7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 DRE-Based FOBT: Common but Not Useful Journal Watch (General), February 1, 2005; 2005(201): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Nadel, J. A. Shapiro, C. N. Klabunde, L. C. Seeff, R. Uhler, R. A. Smith, and D. F. Ransohoff A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Methods for Screening for Fecal Occult Blood Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 86 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Sox Office-Based Testing for Fecal Occult Blood: Do Only in Case of Emergency Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 146 - 148. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
