 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Biliary Disease
7 October 2003 | Volume 139 Issue 7 | Page I-32
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease." It is in the 7 October 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 139, pages 547-557). The authors are J. Romagnuolo, M. Bardou, E. Rahme, L. Joseph, C. Reinhold, and A.N. Barkun.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Bile is a thick fluid secreted by the liver and stored in the gallbladder. It is then released into the upper intestine to help digest food and break down fats. Bile travels from the liver to the gallbladder and the intestine through canals called ducts. Diseases such as stones and cancer can clog the ducts. Doctors can use several tests to diagnose clogged or obstructed biliary tract ducts. Many are "invasive" tests: They require putting a tube down the patient's mouth, injecting dye through a vein, or inserting a needle into the liver. A relatively new noninvasive test is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). This test takes detailed pictures of bile and the biliary tract. Many studies have examined the accuracy of MRCP for diagnosing biliary disease compared with other tests. Do these studies show that MRCP is an accurate test in certain situations and not in others?
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To summarize results of several studies that looked at how well MRCP detects different types of biliary disease.
Who was studied?
4711 patients who had been in 67 studies comparing MRCP with other tests to detect biliary tract obstruction.
How was the study done?
Rather than do a new study, the authors searched medical literature published from January 1987 through March 2003. They selected published studies if the study compared MRCP with another standard test for detecting biliary disease. Most of the comparison standard tests were invasive procedures. By using a type of analysis called meta-analysis, the authors grouped and combined the results from all of the studies to see whether MRCP was as good as the other tests in detecting certain types of biliary disease.
What did the researchers find?
MRCP was accurate for detecting biliary tract obstruction and compared well with most other tests. It appeared slightly less sensitive for diagnosing stones (92%) and for distinguishing benign from malignant obstruction (87%) than for identifying the presence (99%) and actual site or level (96%) of obstruction.
What were the limitations to the study?
Some reviewed studies had weak designs. Some of the accuracy estimates for detecting different types of biliary disease were imprecise.
What are the implications of the study?
MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive test for diagnosing biliary tract obstruction. It usually correctly identifies the presence and level of obstruction. However, it detects some causes of obstruction better than others. It appears slightly less sensitive in detecting stones and in distinguishing benign from malignant causes of obstruction.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. R. Nandalur, H. K. Hussain, W. J. Weadock, E. J. Wamsteker, T. D. Johnson, A. S. Khan, A. R. D'Amico, M. K. Ford, S. R. Nandalur, and T. L. Chenevert Possible Biliary Disease: Diagnostic Performance of High-Spatial-Resolution Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 883 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Q. Knowlton, A. J. Taylor, M. Reichelderfer, and J. Stang Imaging of Biliary Tract Inflammation: An Update Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 984 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Malone and M. Staunton Evidence-based Practice in Radiology: Step 5 (Evaluate)--Caveats and Common Questions Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 319 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Slattery and D. V. Sahani What Is the Current State-of-the-Art Imaging for Detection and Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 913 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Shiga, Z. Wajima, C. C. Apfel, T. Inoue, and Y. Ohe Diagnostic Accuracy of Transesophageal Echocardiography, Helical Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Suspected Thoracic Aortic Dissection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med, July 10, 2006; 166(13): 1350 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schroeder, A. Radtke, H. Kuehl, J. F. Debatin, M. Malago, and S. G. Ruehm Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 900 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. W.S. Rutjes, J. B. Reitsma, M. Di Nisio, N. Smidt, J. C. van Rijn, and P. M.M. Bossuyt Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 14, 2006; 174(4): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Merkle, P. A. Haugan, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, and C. Gullotto 3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR Cholangiography: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 516 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V Shanmugam, G C Beattie, S R Yule, W Reid, and M A Loudon Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 888 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Tatsioni, D. A. Zarin, N. Aronson, D. J. Samson, C. R. Flamm, C. Schmid, and J. Lau Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1048 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Additional articles abstracted in ACP Journal Club Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2004; 9(4): 99 - 99. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 MRCP for Assessment of Suspected Biliary Tract Disease Journal Watch Gastroenterology, December 16, 2003; 2003(1216): 7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 MRCP: Benefits and Limitations Journal Watch (General), October 31, 2003; 2003(1031): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article
