 |
 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
The Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Therapy on the Accuracy of Screening Mammograms
4 February 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 3 | Page I-28
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
The summary below is from the full report titled "Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography." It is in the 4 February 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 138, pages 168-175). The authors are PA Carney, DL Miglioretti, BC Yankaskas, K Kerlikowske, R Rosenberg, CM Rutter, BM Geller, LA Abraham, SH Taplin, M Dignan, G Cutter, and R Ballard-Barbash.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
Mammograms are special x-rays of the breast that can identify breast cancers before a woman or her doctor can feel a lump in the breast. However, mammograms are not totally accurate. They sometimes suggest a cancer when it is not present (a false-positive result). Other times, mammograms look normal even though a cancer is present (a false-negative result). Younger women's breasts contain less fat and are denser than older women's breasts. In addition to age, breast density is affected by hormones, such as combinations of progestin and estrogen or estrogen alone. When a woman takes these hormones, her breasts become less fatty and denser. Mammograms of dense breasts are harder to read than mammograms of fatty breasts. However, the way that breast density, age, and hormone therapy influence the accuracy of mammograms (alone and in combination) is not well understood.
Why did the researchers do this particular study?
To learn how breast density, age, and hormone therapy (alone and in combination) affect the accuracy of screening mammograms.
Who was studied?
329,495 women between 40 and 89 years of age who had mammograms from 1996 to 1998 in several U.S. cities and states.
How was the study done?
The researchers looked at the results of the women's mammograms and whether the breast cancer was eventually diagnosed. They then looked at the accuracy of the mammogram in relation to a woman's age, breast density, and whether she was taking hormone therapy.
What did the researchers find?
The accuracy of mammograms increased as women's breasts became more fatty and less dense. Mammograms were also more accurate as women aged. The accuracy of mammograms was the same for users and nonusers of hormone therapy, as long as the researchers accounted for breast density and age. Hormone therapy by itself did not affect the accuracy of mammograms; however, by its effect on breast density, it affected mammogram accuracy.
What were the limitations of the study?
The study used information from a mammogram registry; thus, information on some women was missing.
What are the implications of the study?
Mammograms are less accurate in young women than in older women and in women with dense breasts than in women with fatty breasts. While hormone therapy may increase breast density, it will not affect the ability of mammography to detect cancer if it is present. However, women with dense breasts may need additional imaging studies to confirm the presence of cancer.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. L. Sprague, A. Trentham-Dietz, M. B. Terry, H. B. Nichols, A. J. Bersch, and D. S.M. Buist Fertility Drug Use and Mammographic Breast Density in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Premenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3128 - 3133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. E. Mason and K. M. White Applying an Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Breast Self-examination J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 946 - 955. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Kavanagh, G. B. Byrnes, C. Nickson, J. N. Cawson, G. G. Giles, J. L. Hopper, D. M. Gertig, and D. R. English Using Mammographic Density to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2818 - 2824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Keyrilainen, M. Fernandez, M.-L. Karjalainen-Lindsberg, P. Virkkunen, M. Leidenius, K. von Smitten, P. Sipila, S. Fiedler, H. Suhonen, P. Suortti, et al. Toward High-Contrast Breast CT at Low Radiation Dose Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 321 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Lee, D. Georgian-Smith, G. S. Gazelle, E. F. Halpern, E. A. Rafferty, R. H. Moore, E. D. Yeh, H. A. D'Alessandro, R. A. Hitt, and D. B. Kopans Detecting Nonpalpable Recurrent Breast Cancer: The Role of Routine Mammographic Screening of Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Reconstructions Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 398 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Taplin, L. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. J. Fenton, E. A. Berns, P. A. Carney, G. R. Cutter, E. A. Sickles, D. Carl, and J. G. Elmore Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Accuracy of Screening Mammography J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 876 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. A. Bowles, D. L. Miglioretti, E. A. Sickles, L. Abraham, P. A. Carney, B. C. Yankaskas, and J. G. Elmore Accuracy of Short-Interval Follow-Up Mammograms by Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1200 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. Williams, K. Lindquist, R. L. Sudore, K. E. Covinsky, and L. C. Walter Screening Mammography in Older Women: Effect of Wealth and Prognosis Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Wong, J. R. Chapman, and J. C. Craig Cancer Screening in Renal Transplant Recipients: What Is the Evidence? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S87 - S100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. T. Chlebowski, G. Anderson, M. Pettinger, D. Lane, R. D. Langer, M. A. Gillian, B. W. Walsh, C. Chen, A. McTiernan, and for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators Estrogen Plus Progestin and Breast Cancer Detection by Means of Mammography and Breast Biopsy Arch Intern Med, February 25, 2008; 168(4): 370 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Pisano, R. E. Hendrick, M. J. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, J. B. Cormack, L. A. Hanna, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. W. Bassett, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 376 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Causer, R. A. Jong, E. Warner, K. Hill, J. W. Wong, B. N. Curpen, and D. B. Plewes Breast Cancers Detected with Imaging Screening in the BRCA Population: Emphasis on MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S165 - S182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, R. Walker, and P. A. Carney Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2007; 99(17): 1335 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Poplack, T. D. Tosteson, C. A. Kogel, and H. M. Nagy Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Initial Experience in 98 Women with Abnormal Digital Screening Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 616 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Lash, M. P. Fox, D. S.M. Buist, F. Wei, T. S. Field, F. J. Frost, A. M. Geiger, V. P. Quinn, M. U. Yood, and R. A. Silliman Mammography Surveillance and Mortality in Older Breast Cancer Survivors J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 3001 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Poplack, T. D. Tosteson, W. A. Wells, B. W. Pogue, P. M. Meaney, A. Hartov, C. A. Kogel, S. K. Soho, J. J. Gibson, and K. D. Paulsen Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 350 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Elmore and J. Choe Breast Cancer Screening for Women in Their 40s: Moving from Controversy about Data to Helping Individual Women Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 529 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Miglioretti and P. J. Heagerty Marginal Modeling of Nonnested Multilevel Data using Standard Software Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2007; 165(4): 453 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Sickles Wolfe Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 301 - 303. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, D. L. Miglioretti, K. R. Yabroff, E. A. Sickles, D. S. M. Buist, C. J. Kasales, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, M. B. Dignan, et al. Factors Associated with Imaging and Procedural Events Used to Detect Breast Cancer After Screening Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Kerlikowske The Mammogram That Cried Wolfe N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 2007; 356(3): 297 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R S Saunders and E Samei Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_2): S117 - S122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S.M. Buist, E. J. Aiello, D. L. Miglioretti, and E. White Mammographic Breast Density, Dense Area, and Breast Area Differences by Phase in the Menstrual Cycle. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2303 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Carney, E. Steiner, M. E. Goodrich, A. J. Dietrich, C. J. Kasales, J. E. Weiss, and T. MacKenzie Discovery of Breast Cancers Within 1 Year of a Normal Screening Mammogram: How Are They Found? Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 512 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lee and M. Zelen Chapter 11: A Stochastic Model for Predicting the Mortality of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 79 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C J Whitaker, C M Kelly, K Faulkner, and E C Stamp Influence of menopausal status and use of hormone replacement therapy on radiation dose from mammography in routine breast screening. Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 79(943): 597 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Boudreau, C. M. Rutter, and D. S.M. Buist The influence of statin use on breast density. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 1026 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Crystal, S. Strano, J. D. Keen, M. H. Ebell, C. Gatsonis, E. D. Pisano, and E. Hendrick Digital and film mammography. N. Engl. J. Med., February 16, 2006; 354(7): 765 - 767. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Fenton, M. B. Barton, A. M. Geiger, L. J. Herrinton, S. J. Rolnick, E. L. Harris, W. E. Barlow, L. M. Reisch, S. W. Fletcher, and J. G. Elmore Screening Clinical Breast Examination: How Often Does It Miss Lethal Breast Cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, November 1, 2005; 2005(35): 67 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D'Orsi, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1773 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. W. Bynum, J. B. Braunstein, P. Sharkey, K. Haddad, and A. W. Wu The Influence of Health Status, Age, and Race on Screening Mammography in Elderly Women Arch Intern Med, October 10, 2005; 165(18): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. McTiernan, C. F. Martin, J. D. Peck, A. K. Aragaki, R. T. Chlebowski, E. D. Pisano, C. Y. Wang, R. L. Brunner, K. C. Johnson, J. E. Manson, et al. Estrogen-Plus-Progestin Use and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women: Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, September 21, 2005; 97(18): 1366 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Kavanagh, J. Cawson, G. B. Byrnes, G. G. Giles, G. Marr, B. Tong, D. M. Gertig, and J. L. Hopper Hormone Replacement Therapy, Percent Mammographic Density, and Sensitivity of Mammography Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1060 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher Screening for Breast Cancer JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Smith-Bindman, P. Chu, D. L. Miglioretti, C. Quale, R. D. Rosenberg, G. Cutter, B. Geller, P. Bacchetti, E. A. Sickles, and K. Kerlikowske Physician Predictors of Mammographic Accuracy J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 358 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Oestreicher, C. D. Lehman, D. J. Seger, D. S. M. Buist, and E. White The Incremental Contribution of Clinical Breast Examination to Invasive Cancer Detection in a Mammography Screening Program Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. F. Brem, J. W. Hoffmeister, J. A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, K. Mohtashemi, G. Jindal, M. P. DiSimio, and S. K. Rogers Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection for Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 439 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Yankaskas, S. H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, P. A. Carney, K. Kerlikowske, R. Ballard-Barbash, G. R. Cutter, and W. E. Barlow Association between Mammography Timing and Measures of Screening Performance in the United States Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. White, D. L. Miglioretti, B. C. Yankaskas, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, K. Kerlikowske, L. Saba, P. M. Vacek, P. A. Carney, D. S. M. Buist, et al. Biennial Versus Annual Mammography and the Risk of Late-Stage Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1832 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1840 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. N. C. Milne, E. A. Krupinski, M. A. Helvie, L. Hadjiiski, and H.-P. Chan Computer-aided Detection of Breast Cancer * Dr Krupinski responds: * Dr Helvie and colleagues respond: Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, and M. S. Mayo Ductal Lavage for Early Detection--What Doesn't Come Out in the Wash J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 2004; 96(20): 1488 - 1489. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. M. Buist, P. L. Porter, C. Lehman, S. H. Taplin, and E. White Factors Contributing to Mammography Failure in Women Aged 40-49 Years J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1432 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Banks, G. Reeves, V. Beral, D. Bull, B. Crossley, M. Simmonds, E. Hilton, S. Bailey, N. Barrett, P. Briers, et al. Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study BMJ, August 28, 2004; 329(7464): 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Roumie, E. L. Grogan, W. Falbe, J. Awad, T. Speroff, R. S. Dittus, and T. A. Elasy A Three-Part Intervention To Change the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Response to New Evidence Ann Intern Med, July 20, 2004; 141(2): 118 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Pepe, H. Janes, G. Longton, W. Leisenring, and P. Newcomb Limitations of the Odds Ratio in Gauging the Performance of a Diagnostic, Prognostic, or Screening Marker Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2004; 159(9): 882 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
Article
