 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
3 September 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 5 Part 1 | Page I-47
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
The summary below is from the full reports titled "Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale" and "Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force." They are in the 3 September 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 137, pages 344-346 and pages 347-360). The first report was written by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; the second report was written by LL Humphrey, M Helfand, BKS Chan, and SH Woolf.
What is the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force?
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a group of health experts that reviews published research and makes recommendations about preventive health care.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
The goal of screening for breast cancer is to find breast cancer at early, treatable stages. Ways to screen for breast cancer include breast self-examination (women feel for lumps in their own breasts), clinical breast examination (doctors or nurses examine women's breasts for lumps), and mammography. Mammography is an x-ray of the breast that often shows breast tumors before they are large enough to feel. Experts do not all agree about whether mammography decreases breast cancer death rates. The disagreement is strongest for mammography in 40- to 49-year-old women.
How did the USPSTF develop these recommendations?
The USPSTF evaluated published research about the risks and benefits of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and screening mammography.
What did the authors find?
The USPSTF found fair evidence that women 40 to 69 years of age who have screening mammography every 1 to 2 years die of breast cancer less frequently than women who do not have screening mammography. The benefits increase as women become older. Inviting 838 women 50 to 69 years of age to have mammography will prevent one breast cancer death. Inviting 1792 women 40 to 49 years of age to have mammography will prevent one breast cancer death. There are few studies of mammography for women 70 years of age and older. The potential harms of mammography include anxiety, procedures, and costs that result from mammograms that suggest cancer when there is none (false positives). The USPSTF found no evidence that breast-self examination or clinical breast examination reduced breast cancer death rates. Other experts have drawn different conclusions from the same evidence; they decided to exclude the results of some studies because of weaknesses in the study methods. The USPSTF also found weaknesses in these studies but did not think the weaknesses justified ignoring the studies' results.
What does the USPSTF suggest that patients do?
The USPSTF recommends that women 40 years of age and older consider having screening mammography every 1 to 2 years. Women should understand that there is a possibility that they will have false-positive results on mammography. They should then weigh the potential risks (anxiety and additional procedures, such as breast biopsy) and the benefits (reduction in breast cancer death rates for women their age) when deciding whether to get mammography. For women 70 years of age and older, the USPSTF recommends screening mammography every 1 to 2 years unless a woman has other serious illnesses that are likely to reduce her life expectancy.
What are the cautions related to these recommendations?
The USPSTF found that almost all of the studies of breast cancer screening had weaknesses. As better studies become available, recommendations about breast cancer screening may change.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. E. Mason and K. M. White Applying an Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Breast Self-examination J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 946 - 955. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. Leung, P. P. S. Woo, B. J. Cowling, C. S. H. Tsang, A. N. Y. Cheung, H. Y. S. Ngan, K. Galbraith, and T.-H. Lam Who receives, benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese? J. Public Health Med., September 1, 2008; 30(3): 282 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. B. Aspy, M. Enright, L. Halstead, and J. W. Mold Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 326 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. A. Dhalla, T. Kiran, H. E. Golden, A. N. Trivedi, W. Rakowski, and J. Z. Ayanian Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2411 - 2411. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. D. Badgwell, S. H. Giordano, Z. Z. Duan, S. Fang, I. Bedrosian, H. M. Kuerer, S. E. Singletary, K. K. Hunt, G. N. Hortobagyi, and G. Babiera Mammography Before Diagnosis Among Women Age 80 Years and Older With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2482 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack, E. B. Mendelson, D. Lehrer, M. Bohm-Velez, E. D. Pisano, R. A. Jong, W. P. Evans, M. J. Morton, et al. Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer JAMA, May 14, 2008; 299(18): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Wharam, A. A. Galbraith, K. P. Kleinman, S. B. Soumerai, D. Ross-Degnan, and B. E. Landon Cancer Screening before and after Switching to a High-Deductible Health Plan Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2008; 148(9): 647 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Dong, D. A. Berry, T. B. Bevers, S.-W. Kau, L. Hsu, R. L. Theriault, and Y. Shen Prognostic Role of Detection Method and Its Relationship with Tumor Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1096 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley Cancer Screening in the United States, 2008: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Cancer Screening Issues CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. L. Scolaro, K. B. Lloyd, and K. L. Helms Devices for home evaluation of women's health concerns Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2008; 65(4): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Yu, A. Park, E. Morris, L. Liberman, P. I. Borgen, and T. A. King MRI Screening in a Clinic Population with a Family History of Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Trivedi, W. Rakowski, and J. Z. Ayanian Effect of Cost Sharing on Screening Mammography in Medicare Health Plans N. Engl. J. Med., January 24, 2008; 358(4): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Bach Cost Sharing for Health Care -- Whose Skin? Which Game? N. Engl. J. Med., January 24, 2008; 358(4): 411 - 413. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M Schwartz and S. Woloshin Participation in mammography screening BMJ, October 13, 2007; 335(7623): 731 - 732. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Beach, A. B. Flood, C. M. Robinson, A. N. Cassells, J. N. Tobin, M. A. Greene, and A. J. Dietrich Can Language-Concordant Prevention Care Managers Improve Cancer Screening Rates? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2058 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Soskolne, S. Marie, and O. Manor Beliefs, recommendations and intentions are important explanatory factors of mammography screening behavior among Muslim Arab women in Israel Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2007; 22(5): 665 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Honjo, J. Ando, T. Tsukioka, H. Morikubo, M. Ichimura, M. Sunagawa, T. Hasegawa, T. Watanabe, T. Kodama, K. Tominaga, et al. Relative and Combined Performance of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: a Pilot Study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 37(9): 715 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. Gemignani Breast Cancer Screening for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: What Is a Clinician to Do? Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 548 - 549. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Robson and K. Offit Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. Reh, K. A. Romero, A. B. Flood, and M. L. Beach Translation of an Efficacious Cancer-Screening Intervention to Women Enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 320 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Punglia, M. Morrow, E. P. Winer, and J. R. Harris Local Therapy and Survival in Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., June 7, 2007; 356(23): 2399 - 2405. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Jatoi, B. E. Chen, W. F. Anderson, and P. S. Rosenberg Breast Cancer Mortality Trends in the United States According to Estrogen Receptor Status and Age at Diagnosis J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 25(13): 1683 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. T. Brewer, T. Salz, and S. E. Lillie Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 502 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Elmore and J. Choe Breast Cancer Screening for Women in Their 40s: Moving from Controversy about Data to Helping Individual Women Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 529 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Evans Welcome to Ruth's World: An Autoethnography Concerning the Interview of an Elderly Woman Qualitative Inquiry, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 282 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 The Utility of Screening Mammography Journal Watch Women's Health, March 1, 2007; 2007(301): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. P.S. Woo, J. J. Kim, and G. M. Leung What Is the Most Cost-Effective Population-Based Cancer Screening Program for Chinese Women? J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 617 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. Boulware, S. Marinopoulos, K. A. Phillips, C. W. Hwang, K. Maynor, D. Merenstein, R. F. Wilson, G. J. Barnes, E. B. Bass, N. R. Powe, et al. Systematic Review: The Value of the Periodic Health Evaluation Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2007; 146(4): 289 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. K. Koh Melanoma Screening: Focusing the Public Health Journey Arch Dermatol, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 101 - 103. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Schoder and M. Gonen Screening for Cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and Limitations J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 4S - 18S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Singh, D. Turner, L. Xue, L. E. Targownik, and C. N. Bernstein Colorectal Cancer Risk Following a Negative Colonoscopy--Reply JAMA, November 22, 2006; 296(20): 2437 - 2438. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Rakowski, H. Meissner, S. W. Vernon, N. Breen, B. Rimer, and M. A. Clark Correlates of Repeat and Recent Mammography for Women Ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2093 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Feuer Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. I.J. Wildschut, T.J. Peters, and C. P. Weiner Screening in women's health, with emphasis on fetal Down's syndrome, breast cancer and osteoporosis Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 499 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Zabicki, J. A. Colbert, F. J. Dominguez, M. A. Gadd, K. S. Hughes, J. L. Jones, M. C. Specht, J. S. Michaelson, and B. L. Smith Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women <= 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Kearney Increasing our understanding of breast self-examination: women talk about cancer, the health care system, and being women. Qual Health Res, July 1, 2006; 16(6): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Kamangar, G. M. Dores, and W. F. Anderson Patterns of Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Across Five Continents: Defining Priorities to Reduce Cancer Disparities in Different Geographic Regions of the World J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2137 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Morton, D. H. Whaley, K. R. Brandt, and K. K. Amrami Screening Mammograms: Interpretation with Computer-aided Detection--Prospective Evaluation Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. A. Greene, C. H. Sox, M. L. Beach, K. N. DuHamel, and R. G. Younge Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 563 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Jorgensen and P. C Gotzsche Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ, March 4, 2006; 332(7540): 538 - 541. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Wampler, T. Ryschon, S. M. Manson, and D. Buchwald Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Breast Cancer Among American Indian Women From the Northern Plains Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2006; 25(1_suppl): 44S - 59S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Mozaffarian Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for Coronary Calcium: A Useful Test to Screen for Coronary Heart Disease? JAMA, December 14, 2005; 294(22): 2897 - 2901. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Berry, K. A. Cronin, S. K. Plevritis, D. G. Fryback, L. Clarke, M. Zelen, J. S. Mandelblatt, A. Y. Yakovlev, J. D. F. Habbema, E. J. Feuer, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1784 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D'Orsi, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1773 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. D. Nelson, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and E. L. Harris Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C Gotzsche and K. J Jorgensen Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Information needs to support informed choices BMJ, August 6, 2005; 331(7512): 350 - 351. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Harris Effectiveness: The Next Question for Breast Cancer Screening J Natl Cancer Inst, July 20, 2005; 97(14): 1021 - 1023. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Nekhlyudov, R. Li, and S. W. Fletcher Information and Involvement Preferences of Women in Their 40s Before Their First Screening Mammogram Arch Intern Med, June 27, 2005; 165(12): 1370 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Article
