 |
 |
|
Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
SUMMARIES FOR PATIENTS
Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
3 September 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 5 Part 1 | Page I-47
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
The summary below is from the full reports titled "Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale" and "Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force." They are in the 3 September 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 137, pages 344-346 and pages 347-360). The first report was written by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; the second report was written by LL Humphrey, M Helfand, BKS Chan, and SH Woolf.
What is the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force?
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a group of health experts that reviews published research and makes recommendations about preventive health care.
What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
The goal of screening for breast cancer is to find breast cancer at early, treatable stages. Ways to screen for breast cancer include breast self-examination (women feel for lumps in their own breasts), clinical breast examination (doctors or nurses examine women's breasts for lumps), and mammography. Mammography is an x-ray of the breast that often shows breast tumors before they are large enough to feel. Experts do not all agree about whether mammography decreases breast cancer death rates. The disagreement is strongest for mammography in 40- to 49-year-old women.
How did the USPSTF develop these recommendations?
The USPSTF evaluated published research about the risks and benefits of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and screening mammography.
What did the authors find?
The USPSTF found fair evidence that women 40 to 69 years of age who have screening mammography every 1 to 2 years die of breast cancer less frequently than women who do not have screening mammography. The benefits increase as women become older. Inviting 838 women 50 to 69 years of age to have mammography will prevent one breast cancer death. Inviting 1792 women 40 to 49 years of age to have mammography will prevent one breast cancer death. There are few studies of mammography for women 70 years of age and older. The potential harms of mammography include anxiety, procedures, and costs that result from mammograms that suggest cancer when there is none (false positives). The USPSTF found no evidence that breast-self examination or clinical breast examination reduced breast cancer death rates. Other experts have drawn different conclusions from the same evidence; they decided to exclude the results of some studies because of weaknesses in the study methods. The USPSTF also found weaknesses in these studies but did not think the weaknesses justified ignoring the studies' results.
What does the USPSTF suggest that patients do?
The USPSTF recommends that women 40 years of age and older consider having screening mammography every 1 to 2 years. Women should understand that there is a possibility that they will have false-positive results on mammography. They should then weigh the potential risks (anxiety and additional procedures, such as breast biopsy) and the benefits (reduction in breast cancer death rates for women their age) when deciding whether to get mammography. For women 70 years of age and older, the USPSTF recommends screening mammography every 1 to 2 years unless a woman has other serious illnesses that are likely to reduce her life expectancy.
What are the cautions related to these recommendations?
The USPSTF found that almost all of the studies of breast cancer screening had weaknesses. As better studies become available, recommendations about breast cancer screening may change.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. L. Sprague, A. Trentham-Dietz, M. B. Terry, H. B. Nichols, A. J. Bersch, and D. S.M. Buist Fertility Drug Use and Mammographic Breast Density in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Premenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3128 - 3133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R. Porembka, R. L. Abraham, J. A. Sefko, A. D. Deshpande, D. B. Jeffe, and J. A. Margenthaler Factors Associated with Lymph Node Assessment in Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Analysis of 1988-2002 Seer Data Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2008; 15(10): 2709 - 2719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Hofvind, P. M. Vacek, J. Skelly, D. L. Weaver, and B. M. Geller Comparing Screening Mammography for Early Breast Cancer Detection in Vermont and Norway J Natl Cancer Inst, August 6, 2008; 100(15): 1082 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Wharam, A. A. Galbraith, K. P. Kleinman, S. B. Soumerai, D. Ross-Degnan, and B. E. Landon Cancer Screening before and after Switching to a High-Deductible Health Plan Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2008; 148(9): 647 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. Williams, K. Lindquist, R. L. Sudore, K. E. Covinsky, and L. C. Walter Screening Mammography in Older Women: Effect of Wealth and Prognosis Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Tyndel, J. Austoker, B. J. Henderson, K. Brain, C. Bankhead, A. Clements, and E. K. Watson What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3823 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Poplack, T. D. Tosteson, W. A. Wells, B. W. Pogue, P. M. Meaney, A. Hartov, C. A. Kogel, S. K. Soho, J. J. Gibson, and K. D. Paulsen Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 350 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Ko, M. J. Nicholas, J. B. Mendel, and P. J. Slanetz Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1483 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Rakowski, H. Meissner, S. W. Vernon, N. Breen, B. Rimer, and M. A. Clark Correlates of Repeat and Recent Mammography for Women Ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2093 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Holford, K. A. Cronin, A. B. Mariotto, and E. J. Feuer Chapter 4: Changing Patterns in Breast Cancer Incidence Trends J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Paskett, C. Tatum, J. Rushing, R. Michielutte, R. Bell, K. L. Foley, M. Bittoni, S. L. Dickinson, A. S. McAlearney, and K. Reeves Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1226 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. N. Feigin, D. M. Keating, P. M. Telford, and M. A. Cohen Clinical Breast Examination in a Comprehensive Breast Cancer Screening Program: Contribution and Cost Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 650 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. Heflin, K. I. Pollak, M. N. Kuchibhatla, L. G. Branch, and E. Z. Oddone The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2006; 61(8): 844 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. K. Stout, M. A. Rosenberg, A. Trentham-Dietz, M. A. Smith, S. M. Robinson, and D. G. Fryback Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst, June 7, 2006; 98(11): 774 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. Barton Exploring and crossing the disparity divide in cancer mortality. Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 614 - 616. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Chew, J. Mandelbaum-Schmid, and S. K. Gao Can Health Journalists Bridge the State-of-the-Science Gap in Mammography Guidelines? Science Communication, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 331 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Lee, K. Lindquist, M. R. Segal, and K. E. Covinsky Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 4-Year Mortality in Older Adults JAMA, February 15, 2006; 295(7): 801 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Crandall and J. P. Pregler Update in Women's Health Ann Intern Med, December 6, 2005; 143(11): 823 - 829. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. W. Bynum, J. B. Braunstein, P. Sharkey, K. Haddad, and A. W. Wu The Influence of Health Status, Age, and Race on Screening Mammography in Elderly Women Arch Intern Med, October 10, 2005; 165(18): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Lipscombe, J. E. Hux, and G. L. Booth Reduced Screening Mammography Among Women With Diabetes Arch Intern Med, October 10, 2005; 165(18): 2090 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. D. Nelson, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and E. L. Harris Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher Screening for Breast Cancer JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. Eberl, M. R. Baer, M. C. Mahoney, S. N. J. Sait, A. W. Block, and C. D. Farrell Unsuspected Klinefelter Syndrome Diagnosed during Oncologic Evaluation: A Case Series J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Oestreicher, C. D. Lehman, D. J. Seger, D. S. M. Buist, and E. White The Incremental Contribution of Clinical Breast Examination to Invasive Cancer Detection in a Mammography Screening Program Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Barth Jr., G. R. Gibson, P. A. Carney, L. A. Mott, R. D. Becher, and S. P. Poplack Detection of Breast Cancer on Screening Mammography Allows Patients to Be Treated with Less-Toxic Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 324 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J Feuer, R. Etzioni, K. A Cronin, and A. Mariotto The use of modeling to understand the impact of screening on US mortality: examples from mammography and PSA testing Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 421 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. McDonald, D. Saslow, and M. H. Alciati Performance and Reporting of Clinical Breast Examination: A Review of the Literature CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2004; 54(6): 345 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Clauser Use of Cancer Performance Measures in Population Health: A Macro-level Perspective J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 142 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Murff, D. R. Spigel, and S. Syngal Does This Patient Have a Family History of Cancer?: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Accuracy of Family Cancer History JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1480 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. F. Jerant, P. Franks, J. E. Jackson, and M. P. Doescher Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Chamot, A. Charvet, and T. V. Perneger Women's Preferences for Doctor's Involvement in Decisions about Mammography Screening Med Decis Making, August 1, 2004; 24(4): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, and and the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committe Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1999 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, and the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committe, N. G. Clark, C. Doyle, T. Gansler, T. Glynn, Y. Hong, R. A. Smith, et al. Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2004; 54(4): 190 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Eyre, R. Kahn, and R. M. Robertson Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1812 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committee, ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committee Member, N. G. Clark, C. Doyle, Y. Hong, T. Gansler, T. Glynn, et al. Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3244 - 3255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Carnes and J. E. Mahoney Update in Women's Health Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 538 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 43 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins Rejoinder Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 69 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Jorgensen and P. C Gotzsche Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study BMJ, January 17, 2004; 328(7432): 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. O. Berg Mammography Screening: Are Women Really Giving Informed Consent? (Counterpoint) J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2003; 95(20): 1511 - 1512. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Domenighetti, B. D'Avanzo, M. Egger, F. Berrino, T. Perneger, P. Mosconi, and M. Zwahlen Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 32(5): 816 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Boyle Global summit on mammographic screening Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1159 - 1160. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Fletcher Screening Sigmoidoscopy-- How Often and How Good? JAMA, July 2, 2003; 290(1): 106 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Gotzsche Screening for Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 769 - 770. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. O. Berg, J. Allan, and S. Woolf The Mammography Dilemma Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 770 - 771. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Goodman The Mammography Dilemma Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 771 - 771. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Fletcher and J. G. Elmore Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., April 24, 2003; 348(17): 1672 - 1680. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Thomas, D. L. Gao, R. M. Ray, W. W. Wang, C. J. Allison, F. L. Chen, P. Porter, Y. W. Hu, G. L. Zhao, L. D. Pan, et al. Randomized Trial of Breast Self-Examination in Shanghai: Final Results J Natl Cancer Inst, October 2, 2002; 94(19): 1445 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
Article
