REPLY
Pharmacoepidemiology of Niacin
David R. Gray and
Moti L. Kashyap
1 March 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 5 | Pages 392-393
IN RESPONSE:
Niacin-induced hepatotoxicity is dose-related and occurs with both immediate-release and sustained-release formulations. Our retrospective cohort study [1] did not include patients receiving immediate-release niacin, and some cases of elevated hepatic enzyme levels may have been missed. In a prospective study, Lavie and colleagues [2] treated patients with "isolated" low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels using a sustained-release niacin preparation similar to the one we used. At a mean daily niacin dose of 2400 mg, 3% of their 36 patients were withdrawn from the study because of threefold elevations in aminotransferase values. Hepatic dysfunction was found in fewer than 3% of nearly 300 other patients [2]. Thus, it is unlikely that we missed a significant number of patients with hepatic dysfunction because of the retrospective nature of our study.
We could identify several factors (hypoglycemic agents, alcohol abuse, and niacin dose) that may predispose patients to niacin-induced hepatotoxicity. By avoiding the use of controlled-release niacin in patients at risk and by treating selected patients with a dose of 1.0 to 2.0 g/d, we have found that controlled-release niacin yields favorable results in terms of tolerance, safety, and efficacy. Both immediate-release and sustained-release niacin were poorly tolerated in the study by McKenney and colleagues [3], which included fewer patients and had withdrawal rates of 39% (9 of 23 patients) and 78% (18 of 23 patients), respectively. Hepatotoxicity, which did not occur in the immediate-release niacin group, was frequent in the sustained-release group, occurring primarily at doses of 2 g/d or higher in 9 of 12 patients. Timed-release niacin capsules, the formulation of sustained-release niacin used by McKenney and colleagues, may not be bioequivalent to other sustained-release niacin formulations [4] and may also be associated with greater hepatoxicity.
Niacin is a broad-spectrum lipid-lowering agent with favorable effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. As indicated in the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines[5], niacin can be safely and effectively prescribed with proper patient selection, dosing, and monitoring. Not all niacin formulations are the same. Significant differences in safety and efficacy can exist among different sustained-release preparations of niacin, many of which are available without medical supervision. This issue needs to be explored further, and a regulatory policy should be developed for use of niacin in the management of dyslipoproteinemia.
1. Gray DR, Morgan T, Chretien SD, Kashyap ML. Efficacy and safety of controlled-release niacin in dyslipoproteinemic veterans. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:352-8.
2. Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Safety and side effects of sustained-release niacin (Letter). JAMA. 1994; 272:513-4.
3. McKenney JM, Proctor JD, Harris S, Chinchili VM. A comparison of the efficacy and toxic effects of sustained-vs immediate-release niacin in hypercholesterolemic patients. JAMA. 1994; 271:672-7.
4. Figge HL, Figge J, Souney PF, Sacks FM, Shargel L, Janosik JE, et al. Comparison of excretion of nicotinuric acid after ingestion of two controlled release nicotinic acid preparations in man. J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 28:1136-40.
5. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Summary of the Second Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA. 1993; 269:3015-23.[Medline]
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.