Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Jungnickel, P. W.
space
  arrow  Maloley, P. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Pharmacoepidemiology of Niacin

right arrow Paul W. Jungnickel and Pierre A. Maloley

1 March 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 5 | Pages 392-393


TO THE EDITOR:

We feel that Gray and colleagues' data [1] do not support their claim that controlled-release and immediate-release niacin have similar toxic effects when used in equipotent doses. Because their study did not include a control group, it did not provide a basis for evaluating differences between the controlled-release and immediate-release forms. The study design probably also resulted in an underestimation of the incidence of niacin-associated hepatotoxicity (the most serious niacin toxicity). Hepatotoxicity was identified by notations on the medical record or by evidence of elevated alkaline phosphatase or aminotransferase levels. However, the authors did not report the frequency of either clinic visits or laboratory monitoring. If visits or monitoring occurred infrequently, asymptomatic elevations of hepatic enzyme levels or hepatotoxicity presenting as a mild flu-like illness could have been missed.

In contrast, the clinical trial of McKenney and colleagues [2] was designed to evaluate differences between sustained-release and immediate-release niacin across varying doses. With sustained-release niacin, they found significant increases in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels at doses of 1500 mg/d or greater; with immediate-release niacin, no such increases were seen at doses as high as 3000 mg/d. Moreover, therapy had to be discontinued because of elevated liver enzyme levels in 12 of 23 patients receiving sustained-release niacin but in no patients receiving immediate-release niacin. Therapy with sustained-release niacin was discontinued at a dose of 1000 mg/d in one patient and at 1500 mg/d in two patients. These findings suggest that sustained-release niacin is more hepatotoxic than immediate-release niacin, even when administered at half the dosage, and argue against Gray and colleagues' claim of similar toxicity at equipotent doses.

The data of McKenney and associates [2] and numerous case reports [3, 4] continue to support the greater hepatotoxic potential of controlled-release niacin preparations and the use of immediate-release niacin as the preferred preparation.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Gray DR, Morgan T, Chretien SD, Kashyap ML. Efficacy and safety of controlled-release niacin in dyslipoproteinemic veterans. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:252-8.

2. McKenney JM, Proctor JD, Harris S, Chinchili VM. A comparison of the efficacy and toxic effects of sustained-vs immediate-release niacin in hypercholesterolemic patients. JAMA. 1994; 271:672-7.

3. Rader JI, Calvert RJ. Hepatic toxicity of unmodified and time-release preparations of niacin. Am J Med. 1992; 92:77-81.

4. Etchason JA, Miller TD, Squires RW, Allison TG, Gau GT, Martialla J, et al. Niacin-induced hepatitis: a potential side effect with low-dose time-release niacin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991; 66:23-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Jungnickel, P. W.
space
  arrow  Maloley, P. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online