LETTER
Freebies: Is the Enemy Us?
Robert P. Ferguson
15 April 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 8 | Page 653
TO THE EDITOR:
As an internal medicine residency program director, I have welcomed the opportunity to meet medical students at residency fairs sponsored by the American Medical Student Association, but I don't like what they are evolving into.
At the October 1992 regional meeting in Cleveland, more than 90 programs, especially in family medicine and internal medicine, were represented. I was out of my league. My modest descriptive poster was surrounded by elaborate program curriculum displays that even included white-water rafting. Students who ran the gauntlet reached me, sheepishly holding shopping bags full of logo-emblazoned mugs, sweatshirts, backpacks, water bottles, and yo-yos. I was too embarrassed to give them our 39/c ballpoint pen. Even if I had been able to get their attention, a solo middle-aged program director was no match for the recruiting "teams," consisting in one instance of seven or eight apparent residents grabbing prospective recruits as they walked by. One team member was an attractive young woman whose smile pulled in students in droves. Later I learned that she was a hospital secretary.
Medical professionals have been outspokenly critical of health professionals' accepting promotional gifts from the pharmaceutical industry [1] and of their conduct of drug fairs [2]. In Cleveland, the pharmaceutical industry was nowhere in sight. To borrow from Pogo, maybe the enemy is us.
1. Goldfinger SE. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112:64-6.
2. Waud DR. Pharmaceutical promotionsa free lunch? N Engl J Med. 1992; 27:351-3.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.