Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Abend, D. S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Osteopathy, Chiropractic, and Spinal Manipulation

right arrow David S. Abend

15 April 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 8 | Pages 651-653


TO THE EDITOR:

Shekelle and colleagues [1] under-represented the important contributions to spinal manipulation by the osteopathic medical profession. There are many osteopaths in the United States who use osteopathic manipulative treatment effectively in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. The data and methods in the review were heavily biased in favor of chiropractic care, omitting many important publications by and including osteopathic physicians [2-5]. Ironically, Andrew Taylor Still, MD, the founder of osteopathic medicine, discovered osteopathic manipulation and its holistic medical approach almost 20 years (1874) before chiropractic was discovered (1895), and D. D. Palmer, the founder of chiropractic, was one of his pupils.

Shekelle and coworkers' article [1] did not mention any osteopathic physicians included among the "specialists." According to their Methods section, Index Medicus and MEDLINE searches did not use the MeSH terms "osteopathic" or "osteopathic manipulation." Using my affiliated hospital's library, I did a MEDLINE search from 1966 to the present, and, after evaluating the bibliographies, I retrieved at least 65 articles and pieces of correspondence that were relevant to the topic of spinal manipulation from an osteopathic, allopathic, and chiropractic perspective.

Osteopaths who are experienced in the area of chronic low-back pain use accepted medical regimens that include appropriate pharmacologic agents, physical therapy, ice and heat, rest, and gradual exercise and stretching to improve mobility. They combine this with injection therapy, spray and stretch mobilization, and specific types of soft-tissue, myofascial, and high-velocity, low-amplitude osteopathic manipulative adjustments and techniques. Using spinal manipulation in such a well rounded and carefully orchestrated manner can be an asset even to MDs.

Although spinal manipulation is controversial, given the popularity of both the chiropractic and osteopathic professions over the last century, perhaps a joint collaboration among osteopaths and chiropractors would be of great benefit to the medical and lay public.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Shekelle PG, Adams AH, Chassin MR, Hurwitz EL, Brook RH. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:590-8.

2. Bourdillon JF, Day EA. Spinal Manipulation. 4th edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1987.

3. Cantu RI, Grodin AJ. Myofascial Manipulation: Theory and Clinical Approach. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1992.

4. DiGiovanna EL, Schiowitz S. An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1991.

5. McMennell J. The Musculoskeletal System. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers; 1992.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
D. S. Abend
You Can Be Both Conventional and Nonconventional
Arch Fam Med, June 1, 1994; 3(6): 487 - 488.
[Abstract] [PDF]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Abend, D. S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online