Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    PDF of this article (PDFs free after 6 months)    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Norris, S. L.    Atkins, D.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

CHALLENGES OF SUMMARIZING BETTER INFORMATION FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Mark Helfand, MD, MPH; Sally Morton, PhD; Eliseo Guallar, MD, PhD; and Cynthia Mulrow, MD, MSc, Editors

Challenges in Using Nonrandomized Studies in Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions

Susan L. Norris, MD, MPH, and David Atkins, MD, MPH

21 June 2005 | Volume 142 Issue 12 Part 2 | Pages 1112-1119

Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are firmly established as the standard for determining which medical treatments are effective. In some areas of health care, however, among them surgery, public health, and the organization of health care delivery, most evidence addressing the effectiveness of clinical or policy interventions rests on nonrandomized studies. We examine the use of study designs other than RCTs in Evidence-based Practice Center reports addressing questions of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. These reports offer the opportunity to examine the approaches used and the challenges faced by reviewers when nonrandomized studies are included and their quality assessed. We then offer recommendations for using these studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.

Author and Article Information

From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Authors of this paper have received funding for Evidence-based Practice Center reports.

Requests for Single Reprints: Susan L. Norris, MD, MPH, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Room 6325, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; e-mail, snorris{at}ahrq.gov

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Hollin Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 89 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Weeks The Regression Effect as a Neglected Source of Bias in Nonrandomized Intervention Trials and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2007; 30(3): 254 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C.H. Cheng and P. T. Choi Evidence-based decision making: current challenges and a new feature in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/La prise de decision fondee sur les preuves : les defis actuels et une nouvelle chronique dans le Journal canadien d'anesthesie Can J Anesth, January 1, 2006; 53(1): 6 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Helfand, S. Morton, E. Guallar, and C. Mulrow A Guide to This Supplement Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1033 - 1034. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Atkins, K. Fink, and J. Slutsky Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]