Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 February 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 3 | Pages 244-247
Primary care is in crisis. Despite its proud history and theoretical advantages, the field has failed to hold its own among medical specialties. While the rest of medicine promises technology and sophistication, the basic model of primary care has changed little over the past half-century. Why has the transition from general practice to today's primary care been so difficult? Many of the causes of this struggle may lie within primary care itself, ranging from failure to articulate to the public (and insurers and policymakers) what value it, and it alone, can offer, to taking on an ever-broadening set of roles and responsibilities while all too often falling short of its promises. Perhaps most important, in the emerging health care system, the lack of a discrete definition of primary care has allowed managed care organizations and payers, among others, to define the role of primary care to suit their own interests.
In response to a changing marketplace, political uncertainty, and shifting consumer expectations, primary care will need to reconstruct itself. The reconstruction will not be easy. Nevertheless, a process should begin that moves the field in the right direction. Building on its unique abilities, primary care can emerge as a redefined product that is attractive to patients, payers, and primary care practitioners alike.
Author and Article Information
From Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts; and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Ellen Weber, MD, for her advice and suggestions.
Grant Support: By grant 039940 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Corresponding Author: Jonathan A. Showstack, PhD, MPH, University of California, 3333 California Street, Suite 265, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118-1944.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Moore: Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th floor, Boston, MA 02215.
Dr. Showstack: University of California, 3333 California Street, Suite 265, San Francisco, CA 94118-1944. SUPPLEMENT: THE FUTURE OF PRIMARY CARE
Primary Care Medicine in Crisis: Toward Reconstruction and Renewal
![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. W. Smetana, B. E. Landon, A. B. Bindman, H. Burstin, R. B. Davis, J. Tjia, and E. C. Rich A Comparison of Outcomes Resulting From Generalist vs Specialist Care for a Single Discrete Medical Condition: A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2007; 167(1): 10 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Kutner, J. M. Westfall, E. H. Morrison, M. C. Beach, E. A. Jacobs, and R. A. Rosenblatt Facilitating Collaboration Among Academic Generalist Disciplines: A Call to Action Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2006; 4(2): 172 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Sox Leaving (Internal) Medicine Ann Intern Med, January 3, 2006; 144(1): 57 - 58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Larson, K. Grumbach, and K. B. Roberts The Future of Generalism in Medicine Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 689 - 690. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Ferrer, S. J. Hambidge, and R. C. Maly The Essential Role of Generalists in Health Care Systems Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 691 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Lesho Should DOs Be More Birdbrained? J Am Osteopath Assoc, September 1, 2004; 104(9): 366 - 367. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Larson and the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Ta Health Care System Chaos Should Spur Innovation: Summary of a Report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine Ann Intern Med, April 20, 2004; 140(8): 639 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gask Powerlessness, Control, and Complexity: The Experience of Family Physicians in a Group Model HMO Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 150 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Sox The Future of Primary Care Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 230 - 232. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Showstack, A. A. Rothman, and S. Hassmiller Primary Care at a Crossroads Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 242 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Rothman and E. H. Wagner Chronic Illness Management: What Is the Role of Primary Care? Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 256 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Sandy and S. A. Schroeder Primary Care in a New Era: Disillusion and Dissolution? Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Showstack, N. Lurie, E. B. Larson, A. A. Rothman, and S. Hassmiller Primary Care: The Next Renaissance Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 268 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||