|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 September 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 5 Part 1 | Pages 347-360
Purpose: To synthesize new data on breast cancer screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Data Sources: MEDLINE; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry; and reference lists of reviews, editorials, and original studies.
Study Selection: Eight randomized, controlled trials of mammography and 2 trials evaluating breast self-examination were included. One hundred fifty-four publications of the results of these trials, as well as selected articles about the test characteristics and harms associated with screening, were examined.
Data Extraction: Predefined criteria were used to assess the quality of each study. Meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were conducted to provide summary relative risk estimates and credible intervals (CrIs) for the effectiveness of screening with mammography in reducing death from breast cancer.
Data Synthesis: For studies of fair quality or better, the summary relative risk was 0.84 (95% CrI, 0.77 to 0.91) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after approximately 14 years of observation was 1224 (CrI, 665 to 2564). Among women younger than 50 years of age, the summary relative risk associated with mammography was 0.85 (CrI, 0.73 to 0.99) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after 14 years of observation was 1792 (CrI, 764 to 10 540). For clinical breast examination and breast self-examination, evidence from randomized trials is inconclusive.
Conclusions: In the randomized, controlled trials, mammography reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women 40 to 74 years of age. Greater absolute risk reduction was seen among older women. Because these results incorporate several rounds of screening, the actual number of mammograms needed to prevent one death from breast cancer is higher. In addition, each screening has associated risks and costs.
Author and Article Information
From Oregon Health & Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; and Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Note: This manuscript is based on a longer systematic evidence review that was reviewed by outside experts and representatives of professional societies. A complete list of peer reviewers is available online at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm.
Disclaimer: The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Stephanie Detlefsen, MD, for her contribution to this evidence review and David Atkins, MD, MPH, from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for their comments on earlier versions of this review. They also thank Kathryn Pyle Krages, AMLS, MA, Susan Carson, MPH, Patty Davies, MS, Susan Wingenfeld, and Jim Wallace for their help with preparation of the manuscript and the full systematic evidence review.
Grant Support: This study was conducted by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (contract no. 290-97-0018, task order no. 2), Rockville, Maryland.
Requests for Single Reprints: Reprints are available from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov) or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (800-358-9295).
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Humphrey and Helfand and Mr. Chan: Oregon Health & Science University, Mailcode BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201-3098.
Dr. Woolf: Virginia Commonwealth University, 3712 Charles Stewart Drive, Fairfax, VA 22033. CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Hovhannisyan, L. Chow, A. Schlosser, M. J. Yaffe, N. F. Boyd, and L. J. Martin Differences in Measured Mammographic Density in the Menstrual Cycle Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2009; 18(7): 1993 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S.M. Buist, M. L. Anderson, S. D. Reed, E. J. Aiello Bowles, E. D. Fitzgibbons, J. C. Gandara, D. Seger, and K. M. Newton Short-Term Hormone Therapy Suspension and Mammography Recall: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, June 2, 2009; 150(11): 752 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Nathan, J. S. Ford, T. O. Henderson, M. M. Hudson, K. M. Emmons, J. N. Casillas, E. A. Lown, K. K. Ness, and K. C. Oeffinger Health Behaviors, Medical Care, and Interventions to Promote Healthy Living in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2009; 27(14): 2363 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Miksad, M. Gonen, T. J. Lynch, and T. G. Roberts Jr Interpreting Trial Results in Light of Conflicting Evidence: A Bayesian Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2009; 27(13): 2245 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vinnicombe, S. M. Pinto Pereira, V. A. McCormack, S. Shiel, N. Perry, and I. M. dos Santos Silva Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic Review of Published Data Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 347 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Cummings, J. A. Tice, S. Bauer, W. S. Browner, J. Cuzick, E. Ziv, V. Vogel, J. Shepherd, C. Vachon, R. Smith-Bindman, et al. Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk J Natl Cancer Inst, March 18, 2009; 101(6): 384 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Barry and A. J. Mulley Jr Why Are a High Overdiagnosis Probability and a Long Lead Time for Prostate Cancer Screening So Important? J Natl Cancer Inst, March 18, 2009; 101(6): 362 - 363. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Miller, J. B. King, A. B. Ryerson, C. R. Eheman, and M. C. White Mammography Use from 2000 to 2006: State-Level Trends with Corresponding Breast Cancer Incidence Rates Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg Tailored Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer: What Now and What Next? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 390 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Wolf and R. F. Brem Decreased Mammography Utilization in the United States: Why and How Can We Reverse the Trend? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 400 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2009; 59(1): 27 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Yabroff, C. J. Bradley, A. B. Mariotto, M. L. Brown, and E. J. Feuer Estimates and Projections of Value of Life Lost From Cancer Deaths in the United States J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1755 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Mason and K. M. White Applying an Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Breast Self-examination J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 946 - 955. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Leung, P. P. S. Woo, B. J. Cowling, C. S. H. Tsang, A. N. Y. Cheung, H. Y. S. Ngan, K. Galbraith, and T.-H. Lam Who receives, benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese? J. Public Health Med., September 1, 2008; 30(3): 282 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Aspy, M. Enright, L. Halstead, and J. W. Mold Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 326 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Dhalla, T. Kiran, H. E. Golden, A. N. Trivedi, W. Rakowski, and J. Z. Ayanian Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2411 - 2411. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Badgwell, S. H. Giordano, Z. Z. Duan, S. Fang, I. Bedrosian, H. M. Kuerer, S. E. Singletary, K. K. Hunt, G. N. Hortobagyi, and G. Babiera Mammography Before Diagnosis Among Women Age 80 Years and Older With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2482 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack, E. B. Mendelson, D. Lehrer, M. Bohm-Velez, E. D. Pisano, R. A. Jong, W. P. Evans, M. J. Morton, et al. Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer JAMA, May 14, 2008; 299(18): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Wharam, A. A. Galbraith, K. P. Kleinman, S. B. Soumerai, D. Ross-Degnan, and B. E. Landon Cancer Screening before and after Switching to a High-Deductible Health Plan Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2008; 148(9): 647 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Dong, D. A. Berry, T. B. Bevers, S.-W. Kau, L. Hsu, R. L. Theriault, and Y. Shen Prognostic Role of Detection Method and Its Relationship with Tumor Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1096 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley Cancer Screening in the United States, 2008: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Cancer Screening Issues CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 161 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Mallin and W. Pavlicek 55-Year-Old Woman With Menopausal Symptoms and a Family History of Breast Cancer Mayo Clin. Proc., April 1, 2008; 83(4): 485 - 488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Scolaro, K. B. Lloyd, and K. L. Helms Devices for home evaluation of women's health concerns Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2008; 65(4): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu, A. Park, E. Morris, L. Liberman, P. I. Borgen, and T. A. King MRI Screening in a Clinic Population with a Family History of Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Trivedi, W. Rakowski, and J. Z. Ayanian Effect of Cost Sharing on Screening Mammography in Medicare Health Plans N. Engl. J. Med., January 24, 2008; 358(4): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Bach Cost Sharing for Health Care -- Whose Skin? Which Game? N. Engl. J. Med., January 24, 2008; 358(4): 411 - 413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M Schwartz and S. Woloshin Participation in mammography screening BMJ, October 13, 2007; 335(7623): 731 - 732. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Beach, A. B. Flood, C. M. Robinson, A. N. Cassells, J. N. Tobin, M. A. Greene, and A. J. Dietrich Can Language-Concordant Prevention Care Managers Improve Cancer Screening Rates? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2058 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Soskolne, S. Marie, and O. Manor Beliefs, recommendations and intentions are important explanatory factors of mammography screening behavior among Muslim Arab women in Israel Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2007; 22(5): 665 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Honjo, J. Ando, T. Tsukioka, H. Morikubo, M. Ichimura, M. Sunagawa, T. Hasegawa, T. Watanabe, T. Kodama, K. Tominaga, et al. Relative and Combined Performance of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: a Pilot Study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 37(9): 715 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Robson and K. Offit Management of an Inherited Predisposition to Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 154 - 162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. Reh, K. A. Romero, A. B. Flood, and M. L. Beach Translation of an Efficacious Cancer-Screening Intervention to Women Enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 320 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Punglia, M. Morrow, E. P. Winer, and J. R. Harris Local Therapy and Survival in Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., June 7, 2007; 356(23): 2399 - 2405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Jatoi, B. E. Chen, W. F. Anderson, and P. S. Rosenberg Breast Cancer Mortality Trends in the United States According to Estrogen Receptor Status and Age at Diagnosis J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 25(13): 1683 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. T. Brewer, T. Salz, and S. E. Lillie Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 502 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Elmore and J. Choe Breast Cancer Screening for Women in Their 40s: Moving from Controversy about Data to Helping Individual Women Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 529 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Evans Welcome to Ruth's World: An Autoethnography Concerning the Interview of an Elderly Woman Qualitative Inquiry, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 282 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Utility of Screening Mammography Journal Watch Women's Health, March 1, 2007; 2007(301): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. P.S. Woo, J. J. Kim, and G. M. Leung What Is the Most Cost-Effective Population-Based Cancer Screening Program for Chinese Women? J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 617 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Boulware, S. Marinopoulos, K. A. Phillips, C. W. Hwang, K. Maynor, D. Merenstein, R. F. Wilson, G. J. Barnes, E. B. Bass, N. R. Powe, et al. Systematic Review: The Value of the Periodic Health Evaluation Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2007; 146(4): 289 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Koh Melanoma Screening: Focusing the Public Health Journey Arch Dermatol, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 101 - 103. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder and M. Gonen Screening for Cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and Limitations J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 4S - 18S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Singh, D. Turner, L. Xue, L. E. Targownik, and C. N. Bernstein Colorectal Cancer Risk Following a Negative Colonoscopy--Reply JAMA, November 22, 2006; 296(20): 2437 - 2438. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Rakowski, H. Meissner, S. W. Vernon, N. Breen, B. Rimer, and M. A. Clark Correlates of Repeat and Recent Mammography for Women Ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2093 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Feuer Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I.J. Wildschut, T.J. Peters, and C. P. Weiner Screening in women's health, with emphasis on fetal Down's syndrome, breast cancer and osteoporosis Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 499 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zabicki, J. A. Colbert, F. J. Dominguez, M. A. Gadd, K. S. Hughes, J. L. Jones, M. C. Specht, J. S. Michaelson, and B. L. Smith Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women <= 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Kearney Increasing Our Understanding of Breast Self-Examination: Women Talk About Cancer, the Health Care System, and Being Women Qual Health Res, July 1, 2006; 16(6): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Kamangar, G. M. Dores, and W. F. Anderson Patterns of Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Across Five Continents: Defining Priorities to Reduce Cancer Disparities in Different Geographic Regions of the World J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2137 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Morton, D. H. Whaley, K. R. Brandt, and K. K. Amrami Screening Mammograms: Interpretation with Computer-aided Detection--Prospective Evaluation Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. A. Greene, C. H. Sox, M. L. Beach, K. N. DuHamel, and R. G. Younge Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 563 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Jorgensen and P. C Gotzsche Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ, March 4, 2006; 332(7540): 538 - 541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Wampler, T. Ryschon, S. M. Manson, and D. Buchwald Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Breast Cancer Among American Indian Women From the Northern Plains Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2006; 25(1_suppl): 44S - 59S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mozaffarian Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for Coronary Calcium: A Useful Test to Screen for Coronary Heart Disease? JAMA, December 14, 2005; 294(22): 2897 - 2901. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Berry, K. A. Cronin, S. K. Plevritis, D. G. Fryback, L. Clarke, M. Zelen, J. S. Mandelblatt, A. Y. Yakovlev, J. D. F. Habbema, E. J. Feuer, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1784 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D'Orsi, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1773 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Nelson, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and E. L. Harris Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C Gotzsche and K. J Jorgensen Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Information needs to support informed choices BMJ, August 6, 2005; 331(7512): 350 - 351. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Harris Effectiveness: The Next Question for Breast Cancer Screening J Natl Cancer Inst, July 20, 2005; 97(14): 1021 - 1023. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Nekhlyudov, R. Li, and S. W. Fletcher Information and Involvement Preferences of Women in Their 40s Before Their First Screening Mammogram Arch Intern Med, June 27, 2005; 165(12): 1370 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. T. Leung Screening Mammography Reduces Morbidity of Breast Cancer Treatment Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1508 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher Screening for Breast Cancer JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Taplin, M. Ulcickas-Yood, A. Geiger, L. Ichikawa, K. Bischoff, and W. Barlow RESPONSE: Re: Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-Up? J Natl Cancer Inst, March 2, 2005; 97(5): 400 - 401. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Jelinski, C. J. Maxwell, J. Onysko, and C. M. Bancej The Influence of Breast Self-Examination on Subsequent Mammography Participation Am J Public Health, March 1, 2005; 95(3): 506 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Barth Jr., G. R. Gibson, P. A. Carney, L. A. Mott, R. D. Becher, and S. P. Poplack Detection of Breast Cancer on Screening Mammography Allows Patients to Be Treated with Less-Toxic Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 324 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. White, D. L. Miglioretti, B. C. Yankaskas, B. M. Geller, R. D. Rosenberg, K. Kerlikowske, L. Saba, P. M. Vacek, P. A. Carney, D. S. M. Buist, et al. Biennial Versus Annual Mammography and the Risk of Late-Stage Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1832 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1840 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Saslow, J. Hannan, J. Osuch, M. H. Alciati, C. Baines, M. Barton, J. K. Bobo, C. Coleman, M. Dolan, G. Gaumer, et al. Clinical Breast Examination: Practical Recommendations for Optimizing Performance and Reporting CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2004; 54(6): 327 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, and M. S. Mayo Ductal Lavage for Early Detection--What Doesn't Come Out in the Wash J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 2004; 96(20): 1488 - 1489. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, M. U. Yood, M. M. Manos, A. M. Geiger, S. Weinmann, J. Gilbert, J. Mouchawar, W. A. Leyden, R. Altaras, et al. Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up? J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 2004; 96(20): 1518 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Gotzsche Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 2004; 96(16): 1257 - 1257. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Chamot, A. Charvet, and T. V. Perneger Women's Preferences for Doctor's Involvement in Decisions about Mammography Screening Med Decis Making, August 1, 2004; 24(4): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J Fenton and J. G Elmore Balancing mammography's benefits and harms BMJ, June 12, 2004; 328(7453): E301 - E302. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Mincey and E. A. Perez Advances in Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Breast Cancer Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2004; 79(6): 810 - 816. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mandelblatt, S. Saha, and M. Helfand Cost-Effectiveness of Mammography for Older Women Ann Intern Med, May 18, 2004; 140(10): 844 - 844. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Walter, K. Lindquist, and K. E. Covinsky Relationship between Health Status and Use of Screening Mammography and Papanicolaou Smears among Women Older Than 70 Years of Age Ann Intern Med, May 4, 2004; 140(9): 681 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Yabroff, N. Breen, S. W. Vernon, H. I. Meissner, A. N. Freedman, and R. Ballard-Barbash What Factors Are Associated with Diagnostic Follow-Up after Abnormal Mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 723 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. M. Duijm, J. H. Groenewoud, J. H. C. L. Hendriks, and H. J. de Koning Independent Double Reading of Screening Mammograms in the Netherlands: Effect of Arbitration Following Reader Disagreements Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 564 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carnes and J. E. Mahoney Update in Women's Health Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 538 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koshy, N. Esiashvilli, J. C. Landry, C. R. Thomas Jr., and R. H. Matthews Multiple Management Modalities in Esophageal Cancer: Epidemiology, Presentation and Progression, Work-up, and Surgical Approaches Oncologist, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gur, J. H. Sumkin, H. E. Rockette, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, L. Hardesty, W. R. Poller, R. Shah, and L. Wallace Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 185 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 43 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baum Commentary: False premises, false promises and false positives--the case against mammographic screening for breast cancer Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 66 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins Rejoinder Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 69 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||