| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 November 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 10 | Pages 783-790
Background: There is little consensus about recommending mammography for women 75 years of age and older. These women have mammography less frequently and are more likely to receive a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer.
Objective: To examine the relationship between use of screening mammography and size and stage of cancer at diagnosis in older women.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Tumor registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.
Patients: 12 038 women who were Medicare beneficiaries, were at least 69 years of age, resided in a SEER area, and received a new diagnosis of breast cancer in 1995 through 1996.
Measurements: Screening mammograms obtained in the 2 years before breast cancer diagnosis (none, one, or at least two) and stage and size of tumor at diagnosis.
Results: Older women (
Conclusion: Mammography in older women is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Disclaimer: This study used the linked SEERMedicare Database. The interpretation and reporting of data from this database are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Dong Zhang of the Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, for his contribution in organizing the database and Dr. Daniel H. Freeman Jr., also of the Office of Biostatistics, for expert statistical advice. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute; the Office of Information Services and the Office of Strategic Planning, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Information Management Services, Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program tumor registries in the creation of the SEERMedicare database.
Grant Support: By the National Cancer Institute (CA72076) and the Department of the U.S. Army (BC990990).
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Jean L. Freeman, PhD, Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0460.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Randolph: National Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3109, Bethesda, MD 20892-7361.
Drs. Goodwin and Freeman and Mr. Mahnken: Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0460.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: W.M. Randolph, J.S. Goodwin, J.L. Freeman.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: W.M. Randolph, J.S. Goodwin, J.D. Mahnken, J.L. Freeman.
Drafting of the article: W.M. Randolph, J.S. Goodwin, J.L. Freeman.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: W.M. Randolph, J.S. Goodwin, J.D. Mahnken, J.L. Freeman.
Final approval of the article: J.S. Goodwin, J.D. Mahnken, J.L. Freeman.
Statistical expertise: J.D. Mahnken.
Obtaining of funding: W.M. Randolph, J.L. Freeman.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: J.L. Freeman. ARTICLE
Regular Mammography Use Is Associated with Elimination of Age-Related Disparities in Size and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis
75 years of age) had larger tumors at diagnosis and were less likely to have undergone screening mammography than younger women (69 to 74 years of age). The association between increased mammography use and smaller tumor size and stage was significantly greater in older women than in younger women (P = 0.010 for stage; P = 0.001 for size). The percentage of regular mammography users who received a diagnosis of high-stage disease (28% vs. 26%; P > 0.2) and the mean size of the tumors (15.0 mm vs. 15.1 mm; P > 0.2) did not significantly differ between younger and older women, respectively. These findings remained constant after controlling for factors that might contribute to biases.
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schootman, D. B. Jeffe, M. Lian, W. E. Gillanders, and R. Aft The Role of Poverty Rate and Racial Distribution in the Geographic Clustering of Breast Cancer Survival Among Older Women: A Geographic and Multilevel Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., December 22, 2008; (2008) kwn369v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Badgwell, S. H. Giordano, Z. Z. Duan, S. Fang, I. Bedrosian, H. M. Kuerer, S. E. Singletary, K. K. Hunt, G. N. Hortobagyi, and G. Babiera Mammography Before Diagnosis Among Women Age 80 Years and Older With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2482 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kerlikowske, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, R. Walker, and P. A. Carney Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2007; 99(17): 1335 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Evans, X. Li, S. R. Robertson, A. M. Boyd, and M. Knopp Sonographic Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes After a Mammographically Recommended Breast Sonogram for Women 55 Years and Older: A Feasibility Study Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 2007; 23(5): 263 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Evans and A. Boyd Sonographic and Vascular Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes: A Review Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 2007; 23(2): 63 - 72. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Litvak and R. Arora Treatment of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients in a Community Hospital Setting Arch Surg, October 1, 2006; 141(10): 985 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Balducci Squaring the Circle: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Women With Breast Cancer J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2005; 60(9): 1135 - 1136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Michielutte, P. C. Sharp, K. L. Foley, L. E. Cunningham, J. G. Spangler, E. D. Paskett, and L. D. Case Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2005; 20(2): 149 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Jerant, P. Franks, J. E. Jackson, and M. P. Doescher Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fox, P. Arnsberger, D. Owens, B. Nussey, X. Zhang, J. M. Golding, F. Tabnak, and R. Otero-Sabogal Patient and Clinical Site Factors Associated With Rescreening Behavior Among Older Multiethnic, Low-Income Women Gerontologist, February 1, 2004; 44(1): 76 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mandelblatt, S. Saha, S. Teutsch, T. Hoerger, A. L. Siu, D. Atkins, J. Klein, M. Helfand, and for the Cost Work Group of the U.S. Preventive Ser The Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography beyond Age 65 Years: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, November 18, 2003; 139(10): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Mammography for Women Older Than 75? Journal Watch (General), December 31, 2002; 2002(1231): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||