Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Kinsinger, L. S.
space
  arrow  Lohr, K. N.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

CLINICAL GUIDELINES

Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

right arrow Linda S. Kinsinger, MD, MPH; Russell Harris, MD, MPH; Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH; Harold C. Sox, MD; and Kathleen N. Lohr, PhD

2 July 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 1 | Pages 59-69

Purpose: Chemoprevention offers promise as a strategy for reducing morbidity and mortality from breast cancer in women. This review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of chemoprevention in women without a history of breast cancer.

Data Sources: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2001).

Study Selection: English-language, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of chemoprevention of breast cancer in women without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer were examined, and 4 relevant trials, 3 involving tamoxifen and 1 involving raloxifene, were selected. Trials that provided data on the harms of tamoxifen or raloxifene, studies of the costs of chemoprevention, and studies of risk assessment were also reviewed.

Data Extraction: Four reviewers independently abstracted data on key variables, including study population, sample size, randomization, treatment, and outcomes.

Data Synthesis: The largest of the RCTs of tamoxifen reported a 49% reduction in relative risk (0.51 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.66]) for invasive cancer among women with an estimated 5-year breast cancer risk of at least 1.66%. The other tamoxifen trials did not observe a statistically significant benefit, but only a few women in each trial took tamoxifen during the entire study period. The raloxifene study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis found a 76% reduction in relative risk (0.24 [CI, 0.13 to 0.44]) for invasive breast cancer. Tamoxifen and raloxifene were effective only against estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Both drugs increased risk for venous thromboembolic disease and hot flashes; tamoxifen increased risk for endometrial cancer and stroke.

Conclusions: Tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce the incidence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in women. The relative risk reduction seems similar across all breast cancer risk groups. The absolute risk reduction varies by risk factors for breast cancer, however, and must be balanced against the potential harms to judge the appropriateness of treatment for individual women.

Author and Article Information
space

From Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Virginia Commonwealth University, Fairfax, Virginia; American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Disclaimer: The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank David Atkins, MD, MPH, Director; Dana Best, MD, MPH; and Eve Shapiro of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Prevention Program. They thank Carmen Lewis, MD, MPH, and Margaret Wooddell, MA, for assistance in reviewing the studies of tamoxifen and raloxifene cited in this paper; Audrina J. Bunton, BA, and Lynn Whitener, MSLS, DrPH, of University of North Carolina, and Sonya Sutton, BSPH, and Loraine Monroe of the Research Triangle Institute; and Bahjat Qaqish, MD, PhD, for statistical assistance.

Grant Support: This study was developed by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Contract No. 290-97-0011), Rockville, Maryland.

Requests for Reprints: Reprints are available from the AHRQ Web site at http://www.ahrq.gov (click on Preventive Services) and in print through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse (800-358-9295).

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Kinsinger: Program on Prevention, CB# 7508, Wing D, Room 383, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7508.

Dr. Harris: Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, CB# 7590, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590.

Dr. Woolf: Department of Family Practice, Virginia Commonwealth University, 3712 Charles Stewart Drive, Fairfax, VA 22033.

Dr. Sox: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572.

Dr. Lohr: Research Triangle Institute, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194.


Related articles in Annals:

Editorials
Making Good Decisions about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
Albert G. Mulley, Jr. AND Karen Sepucha
Annals 2002 137: 52-54. [Full Text]  

Clinical Guidelines
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Annals 2002 137: 56-58. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Summaries for Patients
Using Medication To Prevent Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force
Annals 2002 137: I-62. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1695 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan
Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. L. Stanton, C. A. Bernaards, and P. A. Ganz
The BCPT Symptom Scales: A Measure of Physical Symptoms for Women Diagnosed With or at Risk for Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 16, 2005; 97(6): 448 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. K. Dunn, D. L. Wickerham, and L. G. Ford
Prevention of Hormone-Related Cancers: Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 357 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. L. Lewis, L. S. Kinsinger, R. P. Harris, and R. J. Schwartz
Breast Cancer Risk in Primary Care: Implications for Chemoprevention
Arch Intern Med, September 27, 2004; 164(17): 1897 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. D. McKelvey Jr. and J. P. Evans
Cancer Genetics in Primary Care
J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3767S - 3772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, and W. M. Cronin
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Update: Prevention Trials and Endocrine Therapy of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 495S - 501S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Lippman and W. K. Hong
Cancer Prevention Science and Practice
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5119 - 5125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer
Journal Watch (General), July 19, 2002; 2002(719): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. G. Mulley Jr. and K. Sepucha
Making Good Decisions about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
Ann Intern Med, July 2, 2002; 137(1): 52 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Physicians.