Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Chaiyakunapruk, N.
space
  arrow  Saint, S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Chlorhexidine Compared with Povidone-Iodine Solution for Vascular Catheter–Site Care

A Meta-Analysis

right arrow Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, PharmD, PhD; David L. Veenstra, PharmD, PhD; Benjamin A. Lipsky, MD; and Sanjay Saint, MD, MPH

4 June 2002 | Volume 136 Issue 11 | Pages 792-801

Purpose: Bloodstream infections related to use of catheters, particularly central-line catheters, are an important cause of patient morbidity, mortality, and increased health care costs. This study evaluated the efficacy of skin disinfection with chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Data Sources: Multiple computerized databases (1966 to 2001), reference lists of identified articles, and queries of principal investigators and antiseptic manufacturers.

Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials comparing chlorhexidine gluconate with povidone-iodine solutions for catheter-site care.

Data Extraction: Using a standardized form, two reviewers abstracted data on study design, patient population, intervention, and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection from all included studies.

Data Synthesis: Eight studies involving a total of 4143 catheters met the inclusion criteria. All studies were conducted in a hospital setting, and various catheter types were used. The summary risk ratio for catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88) in patients whose catheter sites were disinfected with chlorhexidine gluconate instead of povidone-iodine. Among patients with a central vascular catheter, chlorhexidine gluconate reduced the risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection by 49% (risk ratio, 0.51 [CI, 0.27 to 0.97]).

Conclusions: These results suggest that incidence of bloodstream infections is significantly reduced in patients with central vascular lines who receive chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine for insertion-site skin disinfection. Use of chlorhexidine gluconate is a simple and effective means of reducing vascular catheter–related infections.


Editors' Notes
space

Context

  • Intravascular catheter–related bloodstream infection is an important and potentially avoidable cause of morbidity.
  • Various antiseptic solutions for skin disinfection and catheter-site care may help prevent catheter-related infections.

Contribution

  • This article summarizes data from eight randomized trials that compared antiseptic solutions.
  • Approximately 1% of the patients with chlorhexidine gluconate disinfectant developed bloodstream infections from intravascular catheters. In the patients with disinfection by povidone-iodine, the rate was 2% (risk ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]).

Implications

  • Chlorhexidine gluconate is more effective than povidoneiodine for intravascular catheter-site care. It is also more expensive.

–The Editors

 

Author and Article Information
space

From Naresuan University, Pitsanuloak, Thailand; University of Washington and Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington; and University of Michigan and Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Gerard Sheehan, MD, John M. Conly, MD, Raphaele Girard, MD, Angela LeBlanc, BSc (Hed), and Valerie Knasinski, RN, for providing citations of additional studies or additional information from their studies. They also thank Todd A. Lee, PharmD, PhD, for helping with the abstraction of these studies.

Requests for Single Reprints: David L. Veenstra, PharmD, PhD, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, Box 357630, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7630; e-mail, veenstra{at}u.washington.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Chaiyakunapruk: Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Naresuan University, Pitsanuloak 65000, Thailand.

Dr. Veenstra: Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Box 357630, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7630.

Dr. Lipsky: Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (S-111-GIMC), 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108-1597.

Dr. Saint: University of Michigan Medical School, Room 7E08, 300 NIB, Campus Box 0429, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0429.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: D.L. Veenstra, S. Saint.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: N. Chaiyakunapruk, D.L. Veenstra, B.A. Lipsky, S. Saint.

Drafting of the article: N. Chaiyakunapruk, B.A. Lipsky.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: N. Chaiyakunapruk, D.L. Veenstra, B.A. Lipsky, S. Saint.

Final approval of the article: N. Chaiyakunapruk, D.L. Veenstra, B.A. Lipsky, S. Saint.

Statistical expertise: N. Chaiyakunapruk, D.L. Veenstra.

Obtaining of funding: D.L. Veenstra, S. Saint.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: N. Chaiyakunapruk.

Collection and assembly of data: N. Chaiyakunapruk.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
Antiseptics To Prevent Infection from Intravascular Catheters
Annals 2002 136: I26. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. M. Costello, D. F. Morrow, D. A. Graham, G. Potter-Bynoe, T. J. Sandora, and P. C. Laussen
Systematic Intervention to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 915 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
O. Mimoz, S. Villeminey, S. Ragot, C. Dahyot-Fizelier, L. Laksiri, F. Petitpas, and B. Debaene
Chlorhexidine-Based Antiseptic Solution vs Alcohol-Based Povidone-Iodine for Central Venous Catheter Care
Arch Intern Med, October 22, 2007; 167(19): 2066 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J Pildal, A Hrobjartsson, K. Jorgensen, J Hilden, D. Altman, and P. Gotzsche
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 847 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. E. Falagas, K. Fragoulis, I. A. Bliziotis, and I. Chatzinikolaou
Rifampicin-impregnated central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 359 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. C. Cummings and J. A. Dolak
Case report: Epidural abscess in a parturient with pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP): [Presentation de cas : un abces peridural chez une parturiente qui presente des papules et des plaques prurigineuses urticariennes de la grossesse (PPPUG)].
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 1010 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. M. Ho and E. Litton
Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2006; 58(2): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Grewal, G. Hocking, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Epidural abscesses
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 292 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. Banton
Techniques to Prevent Central Venous Catheter Infections: Products, Research, and Recommendations
Nutr Clin Pract, February 1, 2006; 21(1): 56 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. E. Rupp, S. J. Lisco, P. A. Lipsett, T. M. Perl, K. Keating, J. M. Civetta, L. A. Mermel, D. Lee, E. P. Dellinger, M. Donahoe, et al.
Effect of a Second-Generation Venous Catheter Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine on Central Catheter-Related Infections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, October 18, 2005; 143(8): 570 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
K. K. Haase, K. A. McCracken, and R. L. Akins
Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit Population
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2005; 18(1): 42 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Infection ControlHome page
C.M. Pellowe, R.J. Pratt, H.P. Loveday, P. Harper, N. Robinson, and S.R.L.J. Jones
The epic project. Updating the evidence-base for national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England: a report with recommendations
Journal of Infection Prevention, December 1, 2004; 5(6): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Rubinson, E. F. Haponik, A. W. Wu, and G. B. Diette
Internists' Adherence to Guidelines for Prevention of Intravascular Catheter Infections
JAMA, December 3, 2003; 290(21): 2802 - 2802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. C. Prielipp and R. J. Sherertz
Skin: The First Battlefield
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 933 - 935.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. El-Hamamsy, N. Durrleman, L.-M. Stevens, T. K. Leung, S. Theoret, M. Carrier, and L. P. Perrault
Incidence and outcome of radial artery infections following cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 801 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. F. Shorr, C. W. Humphreys, and D. L. Helman
New Choices for Central Venous Catheters: Potential Financial Implications
Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 275 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
S. D Krau
Review: chlorhexidine gluconate is more effective than povidone-iodine for preventing vascular catheter related bloodstream infection
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): 18 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. E. Lok, K. E. Stanley, J. E. Hux, R. Richardson, S. W. Tobe, and J. Conly
Hemodialysis Infection Prevention with Polysporin Ointment
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 169 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. S. Garland, K. Henrickson, and D. G. Maki
The 2002 Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infection
Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 1009 - 1013.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Use Chlorhexidine for Vascular Catheter-Site Care
Journal Watch (General), June 18, 2002; 2002(618): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Physicians.