| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 May 2002 | Volume 136 Issue 10 | Pages 723-732
Background: Although some studies suggest that access to cardiac procedures may differ by sex, others have found no evidence of gender bias in cardiac care.
Objective: To study rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in men and women after cardiac catheterization.
Design: Cohort study with prospective data collection.
Setting: Alberta, Canada.
Patients: Persons undergoing cardiac catheterization between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 1998 (n = 21 816).
Measurements: The occurrence of revascularization procedures (PCI or CABG) in the year after cardiac catheterization was measured. Unadjusted revascularization rates, partially adjusted rates (adjusted for clinical variables available in most databases, including administrative databases), and fully adjusted rates (additionally adjusted for extent of coronary artery disease and ejection fraction) were also evaluated.
Results: The unadjusted relative risk was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.71) for the end point of any revascularization in women relative to men. The relative risk increased to 0.69 (CI, 0.66 to 0.72) with partial adjustment and to 0.98 (CI, 0.94 to 1.03) with full adjustment, indicating equivalent access to revascularization for men and women. For PCI, the corresponding relative risks were 0.77 (CI, 0.73 to 0.82), 0.84 (CI, 0.80 to 0.89), and 1.02 (CI, 0.96 to 1.08). For CABG surgery, the relative risks were 0.54 (CI, 0.51 to 0.58), 0.51 (CI, 0.48 to 0.55), and 0.93 (CI, 0.87 to 1.01).
Conclusions: In Alberta, Canada, clinical variables fully explain sex differences in rates of revascularization after cardiac catheterization, and misleading conclusions would arise without full adjustment for clinical differences between men and women. Extreme caution is needed in interpreting reports on access to care that use sparsely detailed clinical data sources.
*For members of the APPROACH Steering Committee, see Appendix.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From University of Calgary, Calgary; University of Alberta, Edmonton; and the APPROACH Project Offices, Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the Calgary Regional Health Authority and the Capital Health Authority for assistance with on-line data entry by cardiac catheterization laboratory personnel.
Grant Support: The APPROACH initiative was initially funded in 1995 by a grant from the Weston Foundation. The ongoing operation of the project has been made possible by contributions from the Province-Wide Services Committee of Alberta Health and Wellness, Merck Frosst Canada, Inc.; Monsanto Canada, Inc.Searle; Eli Lilly Canada, Inc.; Guidant Corp.; Boston Scientific, Ltd.; HoffmannLa Roche, Ltd.; and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Cordis. Analysis was supported by an operating grant from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr. Ghali is supported by a Population Health Investigator Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Alberta, and by a Government of Canada Research Chair in Health Services Research.
Requests for Single Reprints: William A. Ghali, MD, MPH, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada; e-mail, wghali{at}ucalgary.ca.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Ghali: University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
Dr. Faris and Ms. Galbraith: c/o Centre for Health and Policy Studies, 3330 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
Ms. Norris: APPROACH Project Office, 8111 1st Floor ABC, 8440112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada.
Drs. Curtis, Mitchell, and Knudtson: Foothills Hospital, 140329th Street Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
Dr. Saunders: University of Alberta, Room 13-106, 8440112th Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada.
Dr. Dzavik: 200 Elizabeth Street, EN 12-244a, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: WA Ghali, LD Saunders, LB Mitchell, ML Knudtson.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: WA Ghali, PD Faris, PD Galbraith, CM Norris, MJ Curtis, ML Knudtson.
Drafting of the article: WA Ghali.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: PD Faris, PD Galbraith, CM Norris, MJ Curtis, LD Saunders, V Dzavik, ML Knudtson.
Final approval of the article: WA Ghali, PD Galbraith, MJ Curtis, LD Saunders, V Dzavik, LB Mitchell, ML Knudtson.
Provision of study materials or patients: WA Ghali, V Dzavik, ML Knudtson.
Statistical expertise: WA Ghali, PD Faris, CM Norris.
Obtaining of funding: WA Ghali, LD Saunders, ML Knudtson.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: WA Ghali, PD Galbraith, V Dzavik.
Collection and assembly of data: WA Ghali, PD Galbraith, V Dzavik. ARTICLE
Sex Differences in Access to Coronary Revascularization after Cardiac Catheterization: Importance of Detailed Clinical Data
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Norris, J. A. Spertus, L. Jensen, J. Johnson, K. M. Hegadoren, W. A. Ghali, and for the APPROACH Investigators Sex and Gender Discrepancies in Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Among Patients With Established Coronary Artery Disease Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2008; 1(2): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kaul PhD, W.-C. Chang PhD, C. M. Westerhout MSc, M. M. Graham MD, and P. W. Armstrong MD Differences in admission rates and outcomes between men and women presenting to emergency departments with coronary syndromes Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 6, 2007; 177(10): 1193 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. McAlister, A. Oreopoulos, C. M. Norris, M. M. Graham, R. T. Tsuyuki, M. Knudtson, W. A. Ghali, and for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Ass Exploring the Treatment-Risk Paradox in Coronary Disease Arch Intern Med, May 28, 2007; 167(10): 1019 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pilote, K. Dasgupta, V. Guru, K. H. Humphries, J. McGrath, C. Norris, D. Rabi, J. Tremblay, A. Alamian, T. Barnett, et al. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): S1 - S44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Ray, C. M. Norris, J. A. Udell, R. T. Tsuyuki, F. A. McAlister, M. L. Knudtson, and W. A. Ghali Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Outcomes in Heart Failure Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2007; 12(1): 27 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pine, H. S. Jordan, A. Elixhauser, D. E. Fry, D. C. Hoaglin, B. Jones, R. Meimban, D. Warner, and J. Gonzales Enhancement of Claims Data to Improve Risk Adjustment of Hospital Mortality JAMA, January 3, 2007; 297(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Holmes, L. J. Kozak, and M. F. Owings Use And In-Hospital Mortality Associated With Two Cardiac Procedures, By Sex And Age: National Trends, 1990-2004 Health Aff., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, M. B. Olson, K. Kip, S. F. Kelsey, B. D. Johnson, D. B. Mark, S. E. Reis, S. Mankad, W. J. Rogers, G. M. Pohost, et al. The Value of Estimated Functional Capacity in Estimating Outcome: Results From the NHBLI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S36 - S43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vaccarino Angina and Cardiac Care: Are There Gender Differences, and If So, Why? Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 467 - 469. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Daly, F. Clemens, J. L. Lopez Sendon, L. Tavazzi, E. Boersma, N. Danchin, F. Delahaye, A. Gitt, D. Julian, D. Mulcahy, et al. Gender Differences in the Management and Clinical Outcome of Stable Angina Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 490 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Guru, S. E. Fremes, P. C. Austin, E. H. Blackstone, and J. V. Tu Gender Differences in Outcomes After Hospital Discharge From Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Anand, C. C. Xie, S. Mehta, M. G. Franzosi, C. Joyner, S. Chrolavicius, K. A.A. Fox, S. Yusuf, and for the CURE Investigators Differences in the Management and Prognosis of Women and Men Who Suffer From Acute Coronary Syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2005; 46(10): 1845 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Martinez-Selles, R. Lopez-Palop, E. Perez-David, and H. Bueno Influence of Age on Gender Differences in the Management of Acute Inferior or Posterior Myocardial Infarction Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 792 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Wexler, R. W. Grant, J. B. Meigs, D. M. Nathan, and E. Cagliero Sex Disparities in Treatment of Cardiac Risk Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, March 1, 2005; 28(3): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lansky, J. S. Hochman, P. A. Ward, G. S. Mintz, R. Fabunmi, P. B. Berger, G. New, C. L. Grines, C. G. Pietras, M. J. Kern, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 940 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ezekowitz, F. A. McAlister, K. H. Humphries, C. M. Norris, M. Tonelli, W. A. Ghali, M. L. Knudtson, and APPROACH Investigators The association among renal insufficiency, pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in 6,427 patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Guru, S. E. Fremes, and J. V. Tu Time-related mortality for women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A population-based study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1158 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. King, W. A. Ghali, P. D. Faris, M. J. Curtis, P. D. Galbraith, M. M. Graham, and M. L. Knudtson Sex Differences in Outcomes After Cardiac Catheterization: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Time JAMA, March 10, 2004; 291(10): 1220 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Rathore, J. M. Foody, M. J. Radford, and H. M. Krumholz Sex Differences in Use of Coronary Revascularization in Elderly Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Tale of Two Therapies Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2079 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-C. Chang, P. Kaul, C. M. Westerhout, M. M. Graham, Y. Fu, T. Chowdhury, and P. W. Armstrong Impact of Sex on Long-term Mortality From Acute Myocardial Infarction vs Unstable Angina Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2003; 163(20): 2476 - 2484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, H. Bollwein, A. Dibra, H. Schuhlen, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig Gender and restenosis after coronary artery stenting Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2003; 24(16): 1523 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Stein, R. D. Hull, K. C. Patel, R. E. Olson, W. A. Ghali, A. K. Alshab, and F. A. Meyers Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of the Diagnostic Process in Men and Women Arch Intern Med, July 28, 2003; 163(14): 1689 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Barnhart, J. Fang, and M. H. Alderman Differential Use of Coronary Revascularization and Hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, February 24, 2003; 163(4): 461 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Groeneveld Sex Differences in Revascularization Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 237 - 237. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Deeper Look into Access to Revascularization After Catheterization Journal Watch Cardiology, July 19, 2002; 2002(719): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Women Don't Have Reduced Access to Cardiac Procedures Journal Watch (General), June 4, 2002; 2002(604): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||