Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  McCray, A. T.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

Better Access to Information about Clinical Trials

right arrow Alexa T. McCray, PhD

17 October 2000 | Volume 133 Issue 8 | Pages 609-614

Access to information about clinical trials is important to researchers, health care professionals, and patients. Many have argued for the establishment of clinical trials registries, citing their substantial benefits. Although some registries do exist, it has been difficult to create comprehensive, easily accessible systems. This paper briefly reviews existing registries, discusses the challenges in building registries, and reviews some of their benefits. The paper concludes with a description of a new, extensive Web–based registry called ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/), which was developed at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by the National Library of Medicine as a result of recent legislation calling for a comprehensive, publicly accessible registry of clinical trials. The first version of the system became available in late February 2000 and contains information about approximately 5000 trials. The first release contains primarily NIH-sponsored trials, and new trials are regularly added to the system. Subsequent versions will contain information about trials sponsored by other federal agencies and by the private sector. The system was developed in accordance with basic informatics principles, including adherence to standards, usability considerations, and iterative testing and evaluation.

Author and Article Information
space

From the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.

Acknowledgments: The author thanks Kay Dickersin, Valerie Florance, and Brian Haynes for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Requests for Single Reprints: Alexa T. McCray, PhD, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894; e-mail, mccray{at}nlm.nih.gov.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
E. Santoro, V. Rossi, C. Pandolfini, and M. Bonati
DEC-net: the development of the European register of clinical trials on medicines for children
Clinical Trials, August 1, 2006; 3(4): 366 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
J. L. Gold and D. M. Studdert
Clinical Trials Registries: A Reform that is Past Due
J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2005; 33(4): 811 - 820.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. Dickersin and D. Rennie
Registering Clinical Trials--Reply
JAMA, November 19, 2003; 290(19): 2546 - 2546.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. T. Chen, F. G. Miller, and D. L. Rosenstein
Clinical Research and the Physician-Patient Relationship
Ann Intern Med, April 15, 2003; 138(8): 669 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. E. Bekelman, Y. Li, and C. P. Gross
Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review
JAMA, January 22, 2003; 289(4): 454 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. Manheimer and D. Anderson
Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility
BMJ, September 7, 2002; 325(7363): 528 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K. Dickersin
Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 6 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.