Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Poses, R. M.
space
  arrow  Colenda, C. C., III
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Results of Report Cards for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure Depend on the Method Used To Adjust for Severity

right arrow Roy M. Poses, MD; Donna K. McClish, PhD; Wally R. Smith, MD; Elizabeth C. Huber, MD; F. Lynne W. Clemo, MD; Brian P. Schmitt, MD; Donna Alexander, PhD; Edward M. Racht, MD; and Christopher C. Colenda, III, MD

4 July 2000 | Volume 133 Issue 1 | Pages 10-20

Background: The validity of outcome report cards may depend on the ways in which they are adjusted for risk.

Objectives: To compare the predictive ability of generic and disease-specific survival prediction models appropriate for use in patients with heart failure, to simulate outcome report cards by comparing survival across hospitals and adjusting for severity of illness using these models, and to assess the ways in which the results of these comparisons depend on the adjustment method.

Design: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort study.

Setting: A university hospital, a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center, and a community hospital.

Patients: Sequential patients presenting in the emergency department with acute congestive heart failure.

Measurements: Unadjusted 30-day and 1-year mortality across hospitals and 30-day and 1-year mortality adjusted by using disease-specific survival prediction models (two sickness-at-admission models, the Cleveland Health Quality Choice model, the Congestive Heart Failure Mortality Time-Independent Predictive Instrument) and generic models (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II, APACHE III, the mortality prediction model, and the Charlson comorbidity index).

Results: The community hospital's unadjusted 30-day survival rate (85.0%) and the VA medical center's unadjusted 1-year survival rate (60.9%) were significantly lower than corresponding rates at the university hospital (92.7% and 67.5%, respectively). No severity model had excellent ability to discriminate patients by survival rates (all areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve < 0.73). Whether the VA medical center, the community hospital, both, or neither had worse survival rates on simulated report cards than the university hospital depended on the prediction model used for adjustment.

Conclusions: Results of simulated outcome report cards for survival in patients with congestive heart failure depend on the method used to adjust for severity.

Author and Article Information
space

From Brown University and Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, Rhode Island; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois; Northern Virginia Community College, Manassas, Virginia; Emergency Medical Services, Austin, Texas; and Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

Grant Support: By a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS-06274) and a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Physician Faculty Scholarship (Dr. Smith).

Requests for Single Reprints: Roy M. Poses, MD, Brown University Center for Primary Care and Prevention, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, 111 Brewster Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860; e-mail, royposes{at}brownvm.brown.edu.

Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Poses: Brown University Center for Primary Care and Prevention, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, 111 Brewster Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860.

Dr. McClish: Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Box 980032, Richmond, VA 23298-0032.

Dr. Smith: Division of Quality Health Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Box 980306, Richmond, VA 23298-0306.

Drs. Huber and Clemo: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, MCV Campus, Box 980102, Richmond, VA 23298-0102.

Dr. Schmitt: Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 333 East Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611.

Dr. Alexander: Department of Psychology, John Tyler Community College, 13101 Jefferson Davis Highway, Chester, VA 23831-5316.

Dr. Racht: City of Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services, 517 South Pleasant Valley, Austin, TX 78741-1902.

Dr. Colenda: Department of Psychiatry, College of Human Medicine, A-222 East Fee Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1316.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt, E.M. Racht, C.C. Colenda.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt.

Drafting of the article: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt, D. Alexander, C.C. Colenda.

Final approval of the article: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt.

Provision of study materials or patients: R.M. Poses, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, E.M. Racht.

Statistical expertise: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish.

Obtaining of funding: R.M. Poses.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: R.M. Poses, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt, A. Alexander.

Collection and assembly of data: R.M. Poses, D.K. McClish, W.R. Smith, E.C. Huber, F.L.W. Clemo, B.P. Schmitt, D. Alexander, E.M. Racht.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
"Report Card" Grades for Hospitals Depend on the Methods Used for Reporting
Annals 2000 133: 10. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. S. Ross, G. K. Mulvey, B. Stauffer, V. Patlolla, S. M. Bernheim, P. S. Keenan, and H. M. Krumholz
Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review
Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2008; 168(13): 1371 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. Cowper, E. D. Peterson, E. R. DeLong, M. B. Wightman, R. P. Wawrzynski, L. H. Muhlbaier, and M. H. Sketch Jr
The impact of statistical adjustment on economic profiles of interventional cardiologists
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1416 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
C.P. Subbe, M. Kruger, P. Rutherford, and L. Gemmel
Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions
QJM, October 1, 2001; 94(10): 521 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Poor Grades for Heart Failure Report Cards
Journal Watch Cardiology, September 15, 2000; 2000(915): 9 - 9.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.