 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 November 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 9 | Pages 842-845
Clinical software systems are becoming ubiquitous.A growing literature documents how these systems can improve health care delivery, but concerns about patient safety must now be formally addressed. In 1996, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) called for discussions on regulation of software programs as medical devices. In response, a consortium of organizations dedicated to improving health care through information technology developed recommendations for the responsible regulation and monitoring of clinical software systems by users, vendors, and regulatory agencies. These recommendations were revised and approved by the American Medical Informatics Association Public Policy Committee and Board. Other organizations reviewed, modified, and approved the recommendations, and the Boards of Directors of most of the organizations in the consortium endorsed the guidelines. The consortium proposes four categories of clinical system risk and four classes of monitoring and regulatory action that can be applied on the basis of the risk level. The consortium recommends that most clinical software systems be supervised locally and that developers of health care information systems adopt a code of good business practices. Budgetary and other constraints limit the type and number of systems that the FDA can regulate effectively; therefore, the FDA should exempt most clinical software systems and focus on systems that pose high clinical risk and provide limited opportunity for competent human intervention.
Author and Article Information
For the American Medical Informatics Association, the Computer-based Patient Record Institute, the Medical Library Association, the Association of Academic Health Science Libraries, the American Health Information Management Association, and the American Nurses Association.
POSITION PAPER
Summary Recommendations for Responsible Monitoring and Regulation of Clinical Software Systems
From the American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland.
Note: This document represents the opinions of the authors and not the positions of governmental or regulatory agencies. Dr. Miller is Past President (1994-95) and Dr. Gardner is President (1996-97) of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Harold M. Schoolman, MD, for insightful comments.
Grant Support: In part by grants 5-G08-LM-05443 and 1-R01-LM-06226 from the National Library of Medicine (Dr. Miller).
Requests for Reprints: Randolph A. Miller, MD, Room 436 Eskind Library, 2209 Garland Avenue, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Miller: Room 436 Eskind Library, 2209 Garland Avenue, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. S. Field, P. Rochon, M. Lee, L. Gavendo, S. Subramanian, S. Hoover, J. Baril, and J. Gurwitz Costs Associated with Developing and Implementing a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System for Medication Dosing for Patients with Renal Insufficiency in the Long-term Care Setting J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 466 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Kilbridge and D. C. Classen The Informatics Opportunities at the Intersection of Patient Safety and Clinical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 397 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Walker, P. Carayon, N. Leveson, R. A. Paulus, J. Tooker, H. Chin, A. Bothe Jr., and W. F. Stewart EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Osheroff, J. M. Teich, B. Middleton, E. B. Steen, A. Wright, and D. E. Detmer A Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2007; 14(2): 141 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Kuperman, R. M. Reichley, and T. C. Bailey Using Commercial Knowledge Bases for Clinical Decision Support: Opportunities, Hurdles, and Recommendations J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2006; 13(4): 369 - 371. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Miller, for Journal of the American Medical Informatics As, T. Groth, for Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, A. Hasman, for International Journal of Medical Informatics, R. Haux, for Methods of Information in Medicine, A. T. McCray, for Methods of Information in Medicine, et al. On Exemplary Scientific Conduct Regarding Submission of Manuscripts to Biomedical Informatics Journals* J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 113 - 114. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Miller, R. M. Gardner, K. B. Johnson, and G. Hripcsak Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Prescribing Systems: A Time for Responsible Thought and Action J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 403 - 409. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Ash, M. Berg, and E. Coiera Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2004; 11(2): 104 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. Bates, M. Cohen, L. L. Leape, J. M. Overhage, M. M. Shabot, and T. Sheridan Reducing the Frequency of Errors in Medicine Using Information Technology J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2001; 8(4): 299 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Classen Clinical Decision Support Systems to Improve Clinical Practice and Quality of Care JAMA, October 21, 1998; 280(15): 1360 - 1361. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Article
