Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
15 December 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 12 | Pages 1109-1123
Purpose: To provide a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the predictive value of the laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease and to use the resultant data to formulate guidelines for clinical diagnosis.
Data Sources: A MEDLINE search of English-language articles or articles with English-language abstracts published from 1982 to 1996.
Data Extraction: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated, and a random-effects model was used to combine the proportions from the eligible studies. Prespecified criteria were used to determine which studies were eligible for analysis.
Data Synthesis: Laboratory testing in general is not clinically useful if the pretest probability of Lyme disease is less than 0.20 or greater than 0.80. When the pretest probability is 0.20 to 0.80, sequential testing with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot is the most accurate method for ruling in or ruling out the possibility of Lyme disease.
Conclusions: Laboratory testing is recommended only in patients whose pretest probability of Lyme disease is 0.20 to 0.80. If the pretest probability is less than 0.20, testing will result in more false-positive results than true-positive results; a negative test result in this situation effectively rules out the disease.
Author and Article Information
From the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado; New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
POSITION PAPER
Laboratory Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease
![]()
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Diane Gagnon for support in preparing this manuscript.
Requests for Reprints: Peter Tugwell, MD, Department of Medicine, Ottawa General Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Tugwell: Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and Ottawa General Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Binnicker, D. J. Jespersen, J. A. Harring, L. O. Rollins, S. C. Bryant, and E. M. Beito Evaluation of Two Commercial Systems for Automated Processing, Reading, and Interpretation of Lyme Borreliosis Western Blots J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 46(7): 2216 - 2221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Feder Jr., B. J.B. Johnson, S. O'Connell, E. D. Shapiro, A. C. Steere, G. P. Wormser, and the Ad Hoc International Lyme Disease Group A Critical Appraisal of "Chronic Lyme Disease" N. Engl. J. Med., October 4, 2007; 357(14): 1422 - 1430. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Swanson, D. Neitzel, K. D. Reed, and E. A. Belongia Coinfections Acquired from Ixodes Ticks Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 708 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Aguero-Rosenfeld, G. Wang, I. Schwartz, and G. P. Wormser Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2005; 18(3): 484 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Callister, D. A. Jobe, W. A. Agger, R. F. Schell, T. J. Kowalski, S. D. Lovrich, and J. A. Marks Ability of the Borreliacidal Antibody Test To Confirm Lyme Disease in Clinical Practice Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2002; 9(4): 908 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pontrelli, R. Dattwyler, S. Nachman, P. D. Levy, B. M. Kirrane, A. H. Hexdall, A.C.A.P. Leenders, S. M. Bellovin, R. B. Nadelman, G. P. Wormser, et al. Single-Dose Doxycycline for the Prevention of Lyme Disease N. Engl. J. Med., November 1, 2001; 345(18): 1348 - 1350. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bas, P. Muzzin, B. Ninet, J. E. Bornand, C. Scieux, and T. L. Vischer Chlamydial Serology: Comparative Diagnostic Value of Immunoblotting, Microimmunofluorescence Test, and Immunoassays Using Different Recombinant Proteins as Antigens J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2001; 39(4): 1368 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Fawcett, C. D. Rose, S. M. Budd, and K. M. Gibney Effect of Immunization with Recombinant OspA on Serologic Tests for Lyme Borreliosis Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2001; 8(1): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Kouzmitcheva, V. A. Petrenko, and G. P. Smith Identifying Diagnostic Peptides for Lyme Disease through Epitope Discovery Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2001; 8(1): 150 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giocoli Evidence-Based Clinical Microbiology J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2000; 38(9): 3520 - 3521. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Miller, N. El-Hage, K. Babb, and B. Stevenson Borrelia burgdorferi B31 Erp Proteins That Are Dominant Immunoblot Antigens of Animals Infected with Isolate B31 Are Recognized by Only a Subset of Human Lyme Disease Patient Sera J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2000; 38(4): 1569 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Liang, A. C. Steere, A. R. Marques, B. J. B. Johnson, J. N. Miller, and M. T. Philipp Sensitive and Specific Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay with a Peptide Based on an Immunodominant Conserved Region of Borrelia burgdorferi VlsE J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 1999; 37(12): 3990 - 3996. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Aguero-Rosenfeld, J. Roberge, C. A. Carbonaro, J. Nowakowski, R. B. Nadelman, and G. P. Wormser Effects of OspA Vaccination on Lyme Disease Serologic Testing J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 1999; 37(11): 3718 - 3721. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. M. Blaauw, A. M. van Loon, J. F. P. Schellekens, and J. W. J. Bijlsma Clinical evaluation of guidelines and two-test approach for Lyme disease Rheumatology, November 1, 1999; 38(11): 1121 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wang, A. P. van Dam, I. Schwartz, and J. Dankert Molecular Typing of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato: Taxonomic, Epidemiological, and Clinical Implications Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 1999; 12(4): 633 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Brown, S. L. Hansen, and J. J. Langone Role of Serology in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease JAMA, July 7, 1999; 282(1): 62 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Wormser, M. E. Aguero-Rosenfeld, and R. B. Nadelman Lyme Disease Serology: Problems and Opportunities JAMA, July 7, 1999; 282(1): 79 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Gilmore Jr., R. L. Murphree, A. M. James, S. A. Sullivan, and B. J. B. Johnson The Borrelia burgdorferi 37-Kilodalton Immunoblot Band (P37) Used in Serodiagnosis of Early Lyme Disease Is the flaA Gene Product J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 1999; 37(3): 548 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Fawcett, C. D. Rosé, K. M. Gibney, and R. A. Doughty Comparison of Immunodot and Western Blot Assays for Diagnosing Lyme Borreliosis Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 503 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||