Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Sickles, E. A.
space
  arrow  Kopans, D. B.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

IN THE BALANCE

Mammographic Screening for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years: The Primary Care Practitioner's Dilemma

right arrow Edward A. Sickles and Daniel B. Kopans

1 April 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 7 | Pages 534-538

The data from population-based, randomized trials of the mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years are limited by retrospective subgroup analysis, low statistical power, and the use of older mammographic techniques. Nonetheless, meta-analysis involving the most recently reported data from all similarly designed trials shows a 21% mortality reduction in women who have had mammographic screening compared with those in control groups, a statistically significant difference (upper bound of 95% CI, 0.98). Evidence from modern mammography demonstration projects (which are limited by a lack of control groups and the unavailability of mortality results) also shows that the tumor size, axillary lymph node status, and stage of screening-detected breast cancers in women aged 40 to 49 years indicate that screening is at least as beneficial for these women as it is for those aged 50 to 64 years, for whom mammographic screening is widely accepted. Overall, the evidence suggests that screening will benefit women aged 40 to 49 years, but some argue that the level of proof provided is not rigorous enough to establish the efficacy of screening. In the United States, more than 10 000 deaths per year occur among women who develop breast cancer between the ages of 40 and 49. Thousands of lives are probably lost each year because women are not being screened. We believe that it is much more prudent to endorse mammographic screening now, risking the unlikely subsequent determination that the effort was ineffective, than to withhold screening until it is determined whether "proof" of efficacy will be obtained, risking the loss of so many lives. We urge primary care practitioners to recommend routine mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; and Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Requests for Reprints: Edward A. Sickles, MD, Department of Radiology, Box 0628, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.


Related articles in Annals:

Editorials
Screening Mammography in Women Younger than 50 Years of Age
Harold C. Sox
Annals 1995 122: 550-552. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Kopans
Bias in the Medical Journals: A Commentary
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Dot Size, Lead Time, Fallibility, and Impact on Survival: Continuing Controversies in Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1123 - 1130.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. Antman and S. Shea
Screening Mammography Under Age 50
JAMA, April 28, 1999; 281(16): 1470 - 1472.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans
The Breast Cancer Screening Controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40–49
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 4 - 9.
[Full Text]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J. L. Steiner, R. A. Hoff, C. Moffett, H. Reynolds, M. Mitchell, and R. Rosenheck
Preventive Health Care for Mentally III Women
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 1998; 49(5): 696 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
R. M. Weinick and K. M. Beauregard
Women's Use of Preventive Screening Services: A Comparison of HMO versus Fee-for-Service Enrollees
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1997; 54(2): 176 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
MORE ON SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY BEFORE AGE 50
Journal Watch (General), April 18, 1995; 1995(418): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Physicians.