Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Petrek, J. A.
space
  arrow  Bajorunas, D.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Is Body Fat Topography a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer?

right arrow Jeanne A. Petrek; Margaret Peters; Constance Cirrincione; Deborah Rhodes; and Daiva Bajorunas

1 March 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 5 | Pages 356-362

Objective: To determine whether body fat distribution is associated with the onset of breast cancer.

Design: Case-control study.

Setting: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Patients: Three hundred thirteen healthy, white women, born in the United States.

Measurements: Waist and hip circumferences were measured on the day before diagnostic breast surgery, and an extensive risk assessment of clinical and family history data was done. After the results of diagnostic breast surgery were obtained, study participants were divided into three groups: women with breast cancer (n = 156); controls (n = 126) with benign tissue at biopsy and an average risk for breast cancer; and high-risk women (n = 31), defined as being at a risk for breast cancer development of 1% per year, based on rigorous histologic or clinical criteria.

Results: The waist-to-hip ratios (WHR) were identical (mean ±SD) in case patients (0.80 ± 0.06), controls (0.80 ± 0.06), and high-risk women (0.80 ± 0.08). Further, no trend could be detected between increasing WHR and breast cancer risk; the estimated relative risk for cancer incidence in women with WHR ≥ 0.81 was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.36 to 1.71), compared with women with WHR of less than 0.73. No difference in WHR was noted between the case patients and controls when analyzed separately according to menopausal status, age, absolute weight, or relative weight.

Conclusion: In the women studied, body fat topography as defined by WHR was not associated with breast cancer development.

Author and Article Information
space

From Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Requests for Reprints: Jeanne A. Petrek, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021.
Grant Support: In part by American Cancer Society Award PT-331.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Xue and K. B Michels
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: a review of the current evidence
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 823S - 835S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. B. Michels, K. L. Terry, and W. C. Willett
Longitudinal Study on the Role of Body Size in Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2006; 166(21): 2395 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Physicians.